Posted on 02/13/2018 3:12:03 PM PST by MarvinStinson
It’s perfectly ‘important’. The state of the arts is one of the signs of the state of our culture.
Let’s laugh at the Marxo-Muslim homo freak with ejaculate on his face. It’s a riot!!
[I would think somebody has the authority to reject these two monstrosities.]
WE THE PEOPLE reject and demand no rendering from this racist, jihadist artist grace the wall of the WHITE HOUSE.
“I just couldn’t figure out why such a talented artist would put a President’s figure in the silly setting that he did.”
He looks like he’s on, ‘The Throne.’ All he needs is a newspaper or magazine in his hand!
Ridiculous!
The work he does with photoshop and Chinese painters is great. /sarc
The problem is that younger artists are all theory and provocation.
Years ago Tom Wolfe wrote a book attacking modern art for being too theoretical, The Painted Word.
That was something of a cheap shot against the painters of his day, who at least had theories about art.
Today, the theories are about race, gender, and sexual preference and the painters don't just paint pictures anymore.
Politicians can reject their official portraits. LBJ did. Churchill had his burned.
As I said earlier, those, ‘portraits’ were one big F.U. to The American People.
They think they’re SO special! *SPIT*
course it was the artists designer collection to begin with.....
nothing else fits at all..
...a talented artist would put a President’s figure in the silly setting that he did...
Talented artist? Huh? An extra finger on Zer0’s left hand?
A disturbing thingy on his left temple. Sitting in a Briar patch? Done by an “artist”who is famous for paintings with black women holding white womens’ decapitated heads. The only “thing” missing is Moochelles man bulge.
This is one of the strangest displays ever put forth by the Democrat party. They must have been.painted in San Francisco.
The artist does have talent as a painter of portraits; he’s just got a weird internal ‘agenda’ that appears to take precedence over his talent, and over good taste.
Your comment about the ‘Democrat Party’ makes me wonder who actually decides the artists for these official portraits; and someone else has told us that some heads of state have rejected theirs...
I said it twice yesterday.
If you look at the portraits and had to guess which one had a white parent, you’d pick Mooch.
I actually kind of like that dress - for beach vacation wear.
Previous First Ladies have seemed to choose something more classic, that will look more or less timeless and LAST over time.
British writer Oliver Herford wrote:
I always like to see them; they make such a nice couple.
Because he is always so ladylike.
And she is always such a perfect gentleman.
If Picasso blew his nose on a piece of paper,
they’d say, “Look—It’s a masterepiece.”
That was something of a cheap shot against the painters of his day,
.......................................................
WRONG.
Tom Wolfe was writing about the critics who controlled the art world.
You have never read his book.
While most of America was captivated by former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama‘s recently unveiled presidential portraits
I suspect “most of America” was going WTF???
...or trying to suppress their gag reflex.
LOL!
Leave it to the Brits. Their level of wit is something that we didn’t preserve and carry on.
Hmm ... an attack on Greenberg, Rosenberg, and Steinberg?
If I remembered the book that way, I wouldn't even have brought it up.
You have never read his book.
The book came out forty years ago.
Be grateful somebody remembered it at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.