Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jamestown1630
I guess the Obamas were going for something lighter and brighter than the usual presidential portrait, so they didn't go with a more traditional painter.

The problem is that younger artists are all theory and provocation.

Years ago Tom Wolfe wrote a book attacking modern art for being too theoretical, The Painted Word.

That was something of a cheap shot against the painters of his day, who at least had theories about art.

Today, the theories are about race, gender, and sexual preference and the painters don't just paint pictures anymore.

Politicians can reject their official portraits. LBJ did. Churchill had his burned.

67 posted on 02/13/2018 4:39:43 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: x

That was something of a cheap shot against the painters of his day,
.......................................................

WRONG.

Tom Wolfe was writing about the critics who controlled the art world.

You have never read his book.


77 posted on 02/13/2018 5:24:03 PM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson