Good ol' Ruthie, right on top of things as usual !
Posted on 02/12/2018 1:03:00 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
You mean like the FBI ? You little rat.
It doesn’t bother her one bit when the courts are dominated by partisan leftists. It only bothers her when people know that the courts are dominated by leftists.
Putting the cart before the horse...perhaps she should be concerned that the judiciary has become politicized, not whether it's been recognized as such.
Abraham Linoln, back in the day, told Ritchie to cut the crap.
And whose fault is that, Ruth?
Abraham Linoln, back in the day, told RUTHIE to cut the crap.
who woke her up she was better off alseep
Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg’s husband PAID FOR HER SEAT on the SUPREME COURT!! He gave the Clinton Crime Family SLUSH FUND or to the Clinton LIEbrary a huge check!
Too late.
Newsflash: Disgusting vile creep partisan Supreme Court judge
with bo regard for the constitution who does not show for Trump state of the union bemoans partisanship in the judiciary
Good ol' Ruthie, right on top of things as usual !
This beatch should be euthanized.
Sandra Day said it is wrong for Americans to criticize the judiciary.
Bull shit.
With stoopids like Ruth Bader on the bench?
Public stonings would be appropriate.
A little late to be worrying about it, the court is political. Not as bad as 9th circuit but the supreme court has its own problems. Ginsburg is center of it. Too bad she doesn’t sleep as much as Sessions.
When most decisions are 5/4 decisions. It’s partisan.
In a sane world, most would be 9/0.
She’s figuring out that being hyper-partisan has diminishing returns as more and more people realize you’re playing for power and control rather than truth and justice.
Ginsburg has arrived at the endgame of her chosen path, where she can no longer act in any way at all without being seen as partisan.
“courts viewed as partisan”.............so says the partisan
“When most decisions are 5/4 decisions. It’s partisan. In a sane world, most would be 9/0.”
You raise a very interesting and important point. Why is there so much disparity of opinion on the court, if not partisanship? Of course it’s partisan. If it were just a question of faithful interpretation of the Constitution, it clearly wouldn’t be so split, and wouldn’t be split along party lines. The reality is that the opinions rendered by the SC, and in particular the liberal judges appointed by Democrats, are opinions colored and driven by ideology, not by interpretation of the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.