Posted on 02/12/2018 1:03:00 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
One of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's great fears is that the federal judiciary will start to be seen as just another political branch of government divided along partisan lines like Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court justice said Tuesday.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/ginsburg-skip-state-union-speak-rhode-island-52697509
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
ABC is Disney.
I assue the ACLU is her model of nonpartisan.
Is this from the Onion?
She acts as a hyper uber leftist and wonders why the courts have become so partisan.
Notice what she does NOT say. That courts should stick to interpreting the US Constitution AS WRITTEN.
++++++
But he “changed the complexion” of the judiciary by appointing women and minorities to the bench at a time when judges were white and male, she said.
“No president ever returned to the not-so-good-old days,” Ginsburg said.
Ginsburg was one of five Supreme Court justices who skipped Trump’s speech
She wouldn’t give a #### if cankles were president.
It’s a little late for the most partisan SCOTUS Justice in history to start worrying about that.
If this is not a joke, Michelle Smith is the biggest airhead who ever lived.
OMFG!!!!
Start? So she is delusional.
The Supreme Court has been excessively partisan ever since Franklin Roosevelt.
It has been partisan in a “Progressive” direction.
Ginsburg has been one of the most partisan justices ever on the Supreme Court.
Ruth Baider Ginsburg’s great fear: Courts viewed as partisan>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep, Ruthy has done a lot to quell that concern,13 Jul 2016:
*******************************************************
“Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made headlines this week by publicly criticizing Donald Trump. She called him “a faker” who “has no consistency.” And she joked that if Trump were to become president, she might move to New Zealand. Trump fired back with a tweet labeling her comments “very dumb” and calling for her to resign. Today Ginsburg apologized, saying her comments were “ill-advised.” Still, critics of the justice’s behavior—and there are many—say she’s setting a dangerous precedent by taking sides in an election year. ...........”
**********************************************************
RESIGN RUTHY ! YOU’RE DONE!
Feb 11 2018 23:05:41
Anonymous
ID: 0a27cc
346987
The fact Q brought up Ginsberg and then she landed on CNN the same day front page speaks volumes. We are missing something.
Feb 11 2018 23:22:16
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: 5dacd4
347137
>>346987
“Here to stay.”
No, you’re not.
Q
Too late for that, sleepy head.
She is worried the court will become seen as political? Where the hell has she been for the past 50 years?
You mean her great hope.
Remove her for obvious incompetence, lack of discernment, inability to admit facts into evidence, etc.
As displayed here for all to see.
Maybe you’re right and there’s something or a lot of things to this Q.
I really shouldn’t have shot it down before because i know very little about it all.
I have a little ADD and am lucky I can keep up with the basic articles! :)
I’ll leave it to the sharper ones to follow these kinds of things :)
Ciao
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.