What FBI Agent Peter Strzok is admitting in the September 10th text message, is that there are details within the interview of Hillary Clinton that he (and others) intentionally withheld from the September 2nd, 2016, release.
Specifically, evidence withheld in the 302’s would be some of the FBI questions and some of the Hillary Clinton answers to those questions. In essence, the FBI held back actually releasing the full account of the interview.
According to the Strzok text message, the reason for withholding some of the details of the Hillary Clinton interview is because there are “very INFLAMMATORY things” within it; and once congress finds out what was withheld the details will “absolutely inflame” them.
Gosh, how I love waking up to good news.
What I can’t figure out is why would Hillary say anything inflammatory about herself/actions to the FBI and how would she know they would hold back those things in their report?
So I'm a bit confused...
It's become obvious that the FBI policy of not recording interviews is a failed policy. They just hand write personal notes on paper and then submit the notes as an official 302 document up the chain of command. That is grade school nonsense.
Written notes are very subjective and not evidence of fact. It's simply their own take on what was said by the interviewee. Hardly objective. Hell, even our local LEO investigators record interviews or interrogations. This policy needs to be changed, and Sessions has the power to make it so.
I'm okay with the interviewee having an attorney in the room, but there should always be either a video recording, if not an audio recording. I would never talk to the FBI or other LEO unless it were recorded.
This is an issue that needs be addressed by Tucker Carlson, Hannity, and others. Let's spread this bad policy far and wide.
More from the article:
“...Peter Strzok then goes on to say when/if the full FOIA is released, presumably post-election, Jim, Trisha, Dave and Mike are going to have to figure out how to deal with the discrepancy:
…”I’m sure Jim and Trisha and Dave and Mike are all considering how things like that will play out as they talk among themselves.”
“Jim” is likely James Baker, the Chief Legal Counsel for FBI Director James Comey.
“Trish” is likely Trisha Beth Anderson, Office of Legal Counsel for the FBI. [Anderson was hired for the DOJ, by AG Eric Holder, from Eric Holder’s law firm.]
“Dave” and “Mike” currently remain unknown. ...”
In short, these are dirty cops... were they paid in cash, job promotion or under the table by Putin? I’m going to assume FBI thugs murdered Seth Rich... and the Las Vegas killer was on their payroll...
Seems FBI thugs have gone from dirty to treason...
from link:
What FBI Agent Peter Strzok is admitting in the September 10th text message, is that there are details within the interview of Hillary Clinton that he (and others) intentionally withheld from the September 2nd, 2016, release.
Specifically, evidence withheld in the 302’s would be some of the FBI questions and some of the Hillary Clinton answers to those questions. In essence, the FBI held back actually releasing the full account of the interview.
According to the Strzok text message, the reason for withholding some of the details of the Hillary Clinton interview is because there are “very INFLAMMATORY things” within it; and once congress finds out what was withheld the details will “absolutely inflame” them.