Posted on 01/27/2018 12:56:18 AM PST by a little elbow grease
Since Thursday night we’ve been combing the FBI files to figure out exactly what FBI Agent Peter Strzok was referencing in one of the most recently released text messages. We have discovered the context and the text is now damning.
House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte read this specific text message on Thursday night during an interview with Sean Hannity:
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
What FBI Agent Peter Strzok is admitting in the September 10th text message, is that there are details within the interview of Hillary Clinton that he (and others) intentionally withheld from the September 2nd, 2016, release.
Specifically, evidence withheld in the 302’s would be some of the FBI questions and some of the Hillary Clinton answers to those questions. In essence, the FBI held back actually releasing the full account of the interview.
According to the Strzok text message, the reason for withholding some of the details of the Hillary Clinton interview is because there are “very INFLAMMATORY things” within it; and once congress finds out what was withheld the details will “absolutely inflame” them.
Gosh, how I love waking up to good news.
More cow-bell...I meant More Boom
Isn’t this whole thing a conspiracy to obstruct justice at the highest levels? Why aren’t these people being prosecuted?
The FBI is a PR agency for the DNC. A corrupt PR agency with guns and the force of law.
Patience Grasshopper. There is still more evidence to gather.
Did you ever hear the one about the old bull and the young bull?
I am not sure that this is good news. It is bad news if nothing is done about it.
I hope you are right.
What I can’t figure out is why would Hillary say anything inflammatory about herself/actions to the FBI and how would she know they would hold back those things in their report?
“Did you ever hear the one about the old bull and the young bull?”........
First they have to decide IF there IS a “bull” and which one from the herd needs to be culled.
So I'm a bit confused...
“It is bad news if nothing is done about it.”
They’ll see DJT and his family dead before anything is done about it. If something were to happen to fix this mess it would’ve happened by now. Now Sessions’ DOJ doesn’t want the memo released. We’re at a standstill.
“It is bad news if nothing is done about it.”
They’ll see DJT and his family dead before anything is done about it. If something were to happen to fix this mess it would’ve happened by now. Now Sessions’ DOJ doesn’t want the memo released. We’re at a standstill.
Inflammatory to Congress and the American public: “I don’t recall” “Vast right wing conspiracy” “I’m not some little woman standing behind my man like Tammy Wynette.” “I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas.” “There were no classified emails sent or received.” “Wipe it, like with a cloth?” “What difference, at this point, does it make?!” “Why am I not 50 points ahead?!” “Basket of deplorables” “I got [the child rapist] off with time served.” — *these* kinds of inflammatory statements.
Sure doesn’t make sense to me either. Hillary is always scripted...
No notes were taken of the Hillary interview while it was being conducted. The FD-302 was filled out from the agent’s [ahem] memeory after the interview. That’s the reason the 302 has long been called ‘institutionalized perjury’.
Hillary is highly prone to making Freudian slips.
Yes. The old bull said:”No, let’s WALK down and eff all of them.”
What is justice nowadays, anyway?
Another commodity to be purchased by the wealthy and powerful?
Something decided based on geopolitics?
Something given to voting blocs as a loyalty reward?
Decisions made by elitist fools on the dark web playing Clancy games about who should sit in positions of power over people who stink up Walmart?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.