You know, the only thing I see disgusting on this thread are the self righteous blowhards who have never had to hold a small child after they’ve been abused… and see the look of fear in their eyes… and to know that that child’s life has been changed forever because of some sick son of a bitch!
The judge (who had the microphone) in a nationally seen, hi profile case of a horrendous child abuser… did exactly what any person who has been anywhere near child abuse would want her to do.
I feel sorry for the posters on this thread to think otherwise.
A judge should be impartial, unemotional, and speak only to the law. Any judge who adds their own feeling, emotion, anger or political ambition to a judgement is unfit for the bench. That's what liberals do. So she hates child molesters - but what if she hated conservatives instead? Judges don't make law. They simply apply it. Thank God you are not a judge, because you would be an awful one.
The girls he sexually abused were not “small children”-but they were children-and I want to know what in the hell their parents were thinking-you know good and well that at least a few of these girls said something to mom or dad and apparently didn’t get listened to-that is what is disgusting.
He got what he deserved-he does not deserve to have the ammo for an appeal and that is exactly what that judge likely gave him with her making it all about her instead of just doing what judges are supposed to do.
But what you’re doing is just as self righteous
Legally this judge did go on a bit much
Remember Judge Ito
Sometime judges like limelight
Nasser already got a 60 year federal sentence didn’t he for kiddie porn
Why are pervs always juvenile and wormy looking
They never look masculine