Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California AG: "We will prosecute" employers who violate sanctuary laws
WGMD ^ | 1/19/18 | Bradford Betz

Posted on 01/19/2018 2:44:55 AM PST by markomalley

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra warned employers Thursday of legal repercussions if they assist federal immigration officials in an impending crackdown in the sanctuary state, The Sacramento Bee reported.

Under a new state law – the Immigration Worker Protection Act – employers and businesses could face fines of up to $10,000 if they provide employee information to U.S. Immigration Customs, Becerra said.

If employers “start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law,” he said at a news conference.  

The law prevents workers of any immigration status from being detained at workplaces. Among other stipulations, federal officials must obtain a warrant before searching a worksite and employers are required to notify their workers before a federal audit of employee records.

Becerra said the Department of Justice and the Labor Commission’s office – which hold exclusive authority over enforcement – will give “guidance” to public and private employers on their responsibilities under the new law.

The warning comes amid rumors of mass sweeps that will target illegal immigrants in Northern California. Under California’s sanctuary laws, local police are restricted from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

Upon hearing the rumors, local jurisdictions in Northern California said they hadn’t been notified by federal officials of any impending raids.

ICE’s acting director, Thomas Homan told Fox News earlier this month, “If the politicians in California don’t want to protect their communities, then ICE will.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; california; ice; rebellion; sanctuarystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

(a) Criminal penalties
(1)
(A) Any person who—
(snip)
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
(iv) encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or
(v)
(I) engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts,
or
(II) aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
(B) A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(iv) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both

Time to do a sweep against all Democrats (and a bunch of Republicans) in office throughout the State of California. Lock the politicians up first...then go after the aliens.

And if a single ICE officer is killed during a sweep, convict and execute any politician who voted for this sanctuary state garbage.

1 posted on 01/19/2018 2:44:55 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That’s a shot across the bow. Sessions needs to return fire. The government of California is in rebellion. It can’t stand.


2 posted on 01/19/2018 2:51:43 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

These treasonous baztardz need to be thrown in prison for life. The Democrat party is completely disregarding laws and committing endless crimes and it needs to be stopped NOW.


3 posted on 01/19/2018 2:52:11 AM PST by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It’s only setting them up for a massive lawsuit when some illegal kills someone and it’s discovered that the local or state cops could have prevented it. Once that action is establish....it’ll repeat weekly and drive the state into bankruptcy.


4 posted on 01/19/2018 2:53:40 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Trump could be quite brutal here if he wished. He’s only got so much political capital however, and may have to escalate strategically. Having mass uprisings in Leftyland will risk the mushy middle. It could also risk the USSC swing votes putting a finger to the wind.

“What if they passed a law but nobody cared?”


5 posted on 01/19/2018 2:54:40 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

If the past year is any example President Trump is a patient man willing to wait until the time is right.

With the entire media working 24/7 against him, along with all Democrats and most Republicans he has to be careful on when he acts.

California has set up a collision between the state and the Federal Government. It is only a matter of time when this crisis comes to a head.

I think we are about to see a perfect storm engulfing not only the Democrats but the media. It is then I believe President Trump will act.


6 posted on 01/19/2018 3:00:55 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Definitely going to Supreme Court. A state has no say over immigration laws. Ca law is void on its face.


7 posted on 01/19/2018 3:01:00 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

That’s what’s probably going to happen. It will go down in a whimper, not a bang. Most feathers, least hissing.


8 posted on 01/19/2018 3:05:25 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Liz; AuntB; La Lydia; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ...

You go ahead and do that...

and see how far you get in accordance with US laws...


9 posted on 01/19/2018 3:13:13 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra

Hispanic protecting Hispanics.

Pretty common now.

Many are there to advance the Hispanic agenda, not to serve all citizens, do their jobs and keep their oath of office.

Just like democrats everywhere who put the democrat party first before the nation, honor, and oath of office.

Wait until we have widespread muslims in government positions of authority and as judges.

We already see a little of what that will be like in the killing of Justine Damond by a Minneapolis muslim cop.

An unprovoked Cold blooded shooting of an unarmed white Australian woman by a black Somali muslim cop and the prosecutor says there is insufficient evidence to press charges.


10 posted on 01/19/2018 3:13:51 AM PST by Vlad The Inhaler (The only trannie I want to see is a Muncie 4 speed M-22 Rock Crusher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vlad The Inhaler; Tennessee Nana; TADSLOS
Hispanic Becerra protecting Hispanics......here to advance the Hispanic agenda, not to serve US citizens, do their US jobs and keep their US oath of office. Just like democrats everywhere who put the democrat party first before the nation, honor, and oath of office.

The number of times Becerra was faihful to American values is zero. Mostly disparages and humiliates patriotic American voters.

Like the fictional Philip Nolan.....”The Man Without a Country,” Becerra seems to have renounced our nation......acts like he never heard of the United States of America.

Even more egregious one could conclude he was given explicit orders.......”no one who crawled across the border should ever mention the United States of America ever again.”

11 posted on 01/19/2018 3:26:25 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vlad The Inhaler
Wait until we have widespread muslims in government positions of authority and as judges.

Meet the Muslim Congressman with a stranglehold on your safety and security.

Muslim Democrat Cong Andre Carson's Congressional Committees

NOTE--The DNC places a price on these committees---Congressman wishing to be placed on the committee pay up front. Where did Muslim Carson get the money to get on these highly sensitive committees?

Is Carson funneling Islamic cash into the DNC?

Do Indiana constituents know Carson bought these seats?

<><>House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)

<><>Ranking Member: Emerging Threats Subcommittee

<><>Department of Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture Subcommittee

<><>The United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) is a committee of the United States House of Representatives.

The HPSCI is charged with the oversight of the United States Intelligence Community, which includes the intelligence and intelligence related activities of 17 elements of the US Government, and the Military Intelligence Program. Additional information about the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) can be found at link.

<><>Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

<><> Subcommittee on Aviation

<><> Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials

NOTE The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure oversees all modes of transportation: aviation, maritime and waterborne transportation, highways, bridges, mass transit, and railroads.

The Committee also has jurisdiction over other aspects of our national infrastructure, such as clean water and waste water management, the transport of resources by pipeline, flood damage reduction, the management of federally owned real estate and public buildings, the development of economically depressed rural and urban areas, disaster preparedness and response, and hazardous materials transportation.

<><>Subcommittee on Aviation---- The subcommittee has jurisdiction over civil aviation, including most aspects of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Transportation Security Administration, and the National Transportation Safety Board.

<><> Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials The Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials exercises jurisdiction over the programs and activities of two U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) modal administrations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

The Subcommittee oversees the passenger and freight rail safety and economic regulations including all federal laws and programs regulating railroad transportation, including railroad safety, rail infrastructure programs, economic regulation, railroad labor laws, and the non-revenue aspects of the federal railroad retirement and railroad unemployment systems.

The jurisdiction of the Subcommittee also includes overseeing all federal laws and programs regulating the safety of gas and liquid pipelines.

======================================

ANALYSIS Usually Congressman choose committees that help their area and their constituency. Does Indiana need copious amts of US intel and....plans for all of our critical infrastructures, that Cong Andre Carson opted for?

Let’s ask Indiana media: links to Indiana media https://www.in.gov/library/newslinks.htm

Top daily newspapers in Indiana, based on audited and reported circulation figures.
The Indianapolis Star – Indianapolis, IN – 134,113
The Times – Munster, IN – 85,806
South Bend Tribune – South Bend, IN – 51,195

=========================================

Speaker Ryan has the power to remove Carson from these committees.

ACTION NOW----Call President Trump:
Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

CONTACT CONGRESS---- Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044

12 posted on 01/19/2018 3:31:17 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

The security and privacy features on the ICE anonymous tip line will become paramount. Such tips will need to be protected from use in any prosecutions in any court.


13 posted on 01/19/2018 3:31:58 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Definitely going to Supreme Court. A state has no say over immigration laws. Ca law is void on its face.
______________________
This matter will become known as Little Rock II. Orval Faubus learned this lesson, now a new batch of liberals need the same Federal 2X4 across their brow.
14 posted on 01/19/2018 3:32:06 AM PST by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Oh no you won’t, taco-bender.


15 posted on 01/19/2018 3:32:56 AM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Definitely going to Supreme Court. A state has no say over immigration laws. Ca law is void on its face.

It is against the Constitution for any state government to make law to over-ride or contradict any standing federal statute. Local ordinances may manipulate aspects around it but if the federal hammers come down, the local government will get crushed.

16 posted on 01/19/2018 3:35:36 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vlad The Inhaler
We already see a little of the disastrous effects of Obama's letting in Muslims, via the killing of Justine Diamond by a Minneapolis Somali Muslim cop.

UPDATE An unprovoked cold-blooded shooting of an unarmed white Australian woman by a black Somali muslim cop and the prosecutor says there is insufficient evidence to press charges.

Somalis in Minnesota----Somali councilman at podium----unite to defend Somali policeman who shot girl saying he was an "American......but when he joined the police dept--he was hailed as a Somali. They want it both ways.

Nice how they assimilate, isnt it?

================================

Somali Police Association in Minnesota---getting dental work, I hope.
One of their Somalis colleagues killed a girl without provocation.

They come to the great melting pot then proceed to set themselves apart from Americans.

17 posted on 01/19/2018 3:40:16 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

On the plus side, California will be a far nicer place to live after Reconstruction...


18 posted on 01/19/2018 3:44:30 AM PST by Namyak (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

“California has set up a collision between the state and the Federal Government. It is only a matter of time when this crisis comes to a head.”

Having been in the room when CEO’s made major decisions I can tell you that the number one concern is liability. The California government has jammed companies between the rock and the hard place. The companies can not do anything about the federal government. The only place they have leverage is in giving contributions to political action committees. Do you think that if they feel their company is threatened by Democrats they will continue to give to Democrats? No matter how Left-leaning their personal views are, they will opt to reduce liability exposure and that means getting rid of Democrats.

There were probably lots of ways the Democrats could have achieved their goals without placing CEO’s in this vice. But they chose the politically loudest and nastiest approach. I think, in the long run, they have hurt themselves; perhaps fatally.


19 posted on 01/19/2018 3:59:22 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“What if they passed a law but nobody cared?”

I think that’s what may have happened. If the state of California should start cracking down in businesses that disregard it’s sanctuary laws these businesses may either shut down or leave or both. Regardless, the state will continue its downward toilet bowl spiral...


20 posted on 01/19/2018 3:59:52 AM PST by snoringbear (,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson