Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Number of workers receiving unemployment benefits falls to lowest level in 44 years
Washington Examiner ^ | 01/10/2018 | by Joseph Lawler

Posted on 01/11/2018 7:59:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The total number of workers receiving unemployment benefits fell to the lowest level in 44 years to end 2017, the Department of Labor reported Thursday.

Altogether, 1.87 million people received unemployment insurance benefits in the last week of the year, the lowest such seasonally-adjusted mark since December of 1973. Benefits are available for up to 26 weeks in most states.

The low number of people utilizing unemployment insurance is a good sign for the economy. Fewer people seeking unemployment benefits suggests that fewer people are getting laid off. Total claims have scraped the lowest levels in decades several times in recent months.

As for new claims for unemployment benefits, they rose 11,000 to 261,000 in the first week of 2018, according to the same report.

Forecasters had expected jobless claims to drop only slightly from the previous week's level of 250,000, the highest such mark since November. Instead, they rose to the highest level since September, when the numbers were inflated by hurricane damage to southern states. The Department of Labor said that hurricane-related damage is still affecting the collection of insurance claims in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

Nevertheless, new claims are still below the threshold that would suggest that unemployment could start rising, which economists peg at around 300,000.

In fact, even with unemployment at the lowest rate since the turn of the century, 4.1 percent, job creation has remained strong in recent months, suggesting that joblessness could decline even further in the months ahead. Over the past three months, monthly job gains have averaged 204,000.

New jobless claims fell throughout the end of President Obama's tenure, after spiking during the financial crisis, eventually reaching levels not seen in the mid-2000s. They have continued to grind lower during President Trump's first year in office.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jobs; maga; unemployment

1 posted on 01/11/2018 7:59:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Looks like Obama truly was The Food Stamp President


2 posted on 01/11/2018 8:03:18 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What has to happen now is for the “discouraged workers” who “left” the labor force to begin coming back to work. Things such as work requirements for able bodied Medicaid recipients will help with this. MAGA


3 posted on 01/11/2018 8:05:38 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So how much of a dollar savings are we talking about and will that be applied to the national debt? or will Congress spend it on something else??


4 posted on 01/11/2018 8:06:55 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump must have found that magic wand 0bama was blathering about.


5 posted on 01/11/2018 8:08:40 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Media Response:


6 posted on 01/11/2018 8:10:47 AM PST by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good news for America.

Bad news for the dim bulbs.


7 posted on 01/11/2018 8:10:55 AM PST by Leep (The dims better watch it..Trump is CRAZY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why aren’t the Republicans out there every day reminding everybody that NO Dim voted for the tax cuts?


8 posted on 01/11/2018 8:14:34 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
What has to happen now is for the “discouraged workers” who “left” the labor force to begin coming back to work.

Indeed, there are approx. 10 million MEN, between the ages of 25-54, who have simply disappeared from the labor force. In the 1950's, approx. 97+% of this total age group were in the labor force. Now that number is the about 89 %. How do they live? A big increase in disability and long-term social security payments describes some of it, but otherwise, where are they?

9 posted on 01/11/2018 8:20:11 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Number of ‘’workers’’? First of all ‘’workers’’ is a Marxist term and if you’re a ‘’worker’’meaning you employed and working at something why would you be collecting unemployment?


10 posted on 01/11/2018 8:34:45 AM PST by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Living in their parents basement.


11 posted on 01/11/2018 8:35:31 AM PST by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

And working under the table.


12 posted on 01/11/2018 9:17:56 AM PST by usflagwaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Numbers can be deceiving, did the numbers go down because people found jobs or because they ran out of benefits and were dropped off the rolls into the pit of erasure?

We all know that once benefits end they conveniently stop counting a person as unemployed whether they found work or were driven to live on the street.

There are thousands upon thousands who were and are driven to the street or early retirement because companies will not hire older qualified people because A. they are to expensive to the company and B. The companies fear an older experience person won't stay, that they are just marking time until something better comes along when the truth is they are the most stable employee that wants only to be employed and hopefully have some benefits until regular retirement. It's the young people that are unstable and expensive due to their work ethic and attitude.

13 posted on 01/11/2018 9:21:21 AM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson