Skip to comments.
Next week's special Senate election first to test national Democratic wave in Wisconsin
Wisconsin State Journel ^
| Jan 10, 2018
| Matthew DeFour
Posted on 01/10/2018 8:41:48 PM PST by 11th_VA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Trump at 44% now - hopefully we can win this one ...
1
posted on
01/10/2018 8:41:48 PM PST
by
11th_VA
To: 11th_VA
What surge in Democrat electoral success?
They lost special election after special election. They won one or two, and that’s supposed to be the total record?
LOL
Except for Moore, they’ve had a long string of bad luck.
2
posted on
01/10/2018 8:50:31 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
To: 11th_VA
Most people don’t realize that Mitt Romney got more votes in Wisconsin than Trump got - and Mitt lost the state.
To: DoughtyOne
They even lost the recount in VA and 90% of the time, they win those..
even the coin toss went the wrong way for them.
4
posted on
01/10/2018 8:52:07 PM PST
by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house....)
To: zeestephen
I think some blacks in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania voted for Trump simply by staying home.
That’s the way they wanted to do it.... and that’s just fine by me.
5
posted on
01/10/2018 8:56:54 PM PST
by
Conserv
To: cableguymn
What, they couldnt get HRC down there to make the toss. I hear shes really good at them, having won six in a row in Iowa.
6
posted on
01/10/2018 8:59:07 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: 11th_VA
Yup, Democrats winning everywhere!!!!!!
..../.....s....
To: 11th_VA
His predecessor was Republican. That gives some hope.
8
posted on
01/10/2018 9:12:55 PM PST
by
stars & stripes forever
(Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12")
To: 11th_VA
It doesn't "test" anything. These pundits and political analysts need to stop this nonsense.
It's like when they said the Scott Walker recall election in June 2012 was a "national bellwether," and that Walker winning was good news for Mitt Romney. Obviously that was a load of bologna.
To: DoughtyOne
Well, they’ve won 10% of them!
10
posted on
01/10/2018 9:25:06 PM PST
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: zeestephen
That illustrates the problem when your facing a candidate that is a great activator, that generates turnout like Obama did.
In Wisconsin in the fall the good news is that Walker is on the ballot, and in a different manner he generates GOP turnout. How that will play for the GOP candidate running against the awful Tammy Baldwin, I dunno. I am hoping she is retired.
To: 11th_VA
Uh huh...
To: cableguymn
13
posted on
01/10/2018 10:06:40 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
To: Vendome
14
posted on
01/10/2018 10:13:52 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
To: zeestephen
you post that as if Romney got thousands more when he got 2K more than DJT which is within the recount margin, which means it’s meaningless and not worth mentioning.
Trump got 47% of the vote and Romney 45%.
Trump had to deal with 3.58% of the vote going for the libertarian with 100K votes. In 2012 the closest candidate to Obama and Romney only got 20K votes.
To: snarkytart
The only reason Trump won Wisconsin is because Hillary was overconfident and failed to get her core Black and Hispanic voters to the polls.
Romney did not have the same luck with Obama.
Your analysis of the Libertarian vote does not apply to the 2016 election.
In 2016, the Libertarian candidate for president publicly campaigned for Open Borders and Amnesty.
In 2016, the Libertarian candidate for vice president publicly stated he would vote for Hillary Clinton if he was not on the Libertarian ticket.
Trump would have been lucky to get 50% of the Libertarian vote in 2016.
On the other hand, the always hard left Green Party had record turnout in Wisconsin in 2016, and their 31,000 votes would have won the state for Clinton.
If some visionary had advised the Green Party that Trump would win the election, 90% of them would have switched their vote to Clinton.
To: DoughtyOne
DemocRATS will NEVER leave elections in the hands of the voters again, after Trump won !
STEALING ELECTIONS WITH COMPUTERS and
Technology Cybercrimes, watch Bloomberg's
Digital Defense November 3, 2016 (19:40).
To better understand
"THE MASTER KEY" to stealing elections with computers, watch:
I'LL
NEVER TRUST ANOTHER COMPUTER COUNTED ELECTION AGAIN !
Things have changed!
Bennie Smith, a Memphis computer programmer, discovered HOW this is done through a
" ... a GEMS tabulatorfor Global Election Management Systemwhich is a personal computer installed with Diebold software that sits in a windowless room in the countys election headquarters.
The tabulator is the brains of the system.
It monitors the voting machines, sorts out which machines have delivered data and which havent, and tallies the results.
As voting machines check in and their votes are included in the official count, each machines status turns green on the GEMS master panel.
A red light means the upload has failed.
At the end of Memphiss election night in October 2015, there was no indication from the technician running Shelby Countys GEMS tabulator that any voting machine hadnt checked in or that any votes had gone missing, according to election commission e-mails obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek.
Yet as county technicians followed up on the evidence from Smiths poll-tape photo, they discovered more votes that never made it into the election night count, all from precincts with large concentrations of black voters. ... "
Diebold Election Systems changed its name in 2006 to
Premier Election Solutions.
Bloomberg's article titled
How to Protect Against Election Day Hacking gives more proof of this by Memphis computer programmer Bennie Smith.
"... The method Smith used to catch the problem should be a playbook for any candidate, party or concerned citizen worried about the accurate tallying of their votes:Smith snapped some pictures of printed voting tallies (known as poll tapes) at a high-turnout polling location and then compared the results there to the electronic tabulations.
This is a very good, if labor-intensive, way to check to ensure that votes are being counted correctly.
Smith has created a proof-of-concept program called Fraction Magic, showing how corrupt officials could tamper with GEMS to manipulate election outcomes.
17
posted on
01/11/2018 2:37:48 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: zeestephen
Didnt Wisconsin put in some kind of voter ID to reduce fraud as well ?
18
posted on
01/11/2018 3:18:01 AM PST
by
11th_VA
To: Trump20162020
Local elections are based mostly on local issues and personalities. It isn't rocket science.
Our county row offices were dominated by Democrats since the Eisenhower administration closed. The disgust with ObaMao was so high by the 2011 elections that the Republicans swept them all.
They are now back to roughly the same 60-40 split which reflects party registration in the country. Westmoreland County is very old school Democrat . . . Trump carried it by more than Pennsylvania as a whole.
19
posted on
01/11/2018 7:00:46 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Yosemitest
Thanks for the post. Nice job.
20
posted on
01/11/2018 12:17:49 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson