Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
What a disaster this guy was.

And of course i'm not at all surprised it is you posting a nonsensical opinion.

Given the woman's history, I think she has just made a huge blunder.

5 posted on 01/04/2018 2:53:42 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Given the woman's history, I think she has just made a huge blunder.

I'll bet Moore gives her everything she's asking for.

What say you?

9 posted on 01/04/2018 2:57:33 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

Discovery will be a bitch for her.


11 posted on 01/04/2018 2:58:02 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

It’s a he said/she said situation, but if I understand correctly the rules are different for her than for him.

If she claims defamation she has to prove that he showed “negligence toward the truth” - meaning, perhaps, that she can claim that he didn’t have her psychoanalyzed by a doctor before saying that her claims were politically motivated rather than just wanting money, having a psychological illness, etc.

If he claims defamation from her he has to prove that she knew she was saying untrue things or showed a “reckless disregard for the truth”.

What a double standard.

But Moore should sue to have Allred disbarred before anything comes of this or any other suit from the lying hag. She presented a known forgery as if it was genuine. She needs to go away for a very long time.

And if the GOPee has even half a brain (I know that’s a huge IF) they should be fighting on Moore’s behalf, because everybody is a sitting duck as long as Gloria Allred can get away with not only lying about politicians, but also gagging them from being able to defend themselves lest they then be sued for defamation where the “public figure” has to prove the unprovable but the liar has only to prove that the politician didn’t turn over every possible leaf to rule out any possibility that the dame is just crazy rather than deliberately lying.


27 posted on 01/04/2018 3:10:37 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

Exactly. We know everything about Moore. We are about to learn about her.


51 posted on 01/04/2018 3:23:55 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

Didn’t she admit to falsifying the supposed signature in her yearbook?


124 posted on 01/04/2018 6:13:03 PM PST by Puckster (70 weeks of Daniel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

She sure did.Now he can go into her past.Guess they still feel a threat from him.


133 posted on 01/05/2018 5:44:55 AM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson