Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The unseen cost of solar farms on taxpayers in North Carolina (80% tax abatement 2 companies)
WNCT news (Washington, NC) ^ | Jan 2, 2018 | Josh Burch

Posted on 01/03/2018 9:32:28 AM PST by huldah1776

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: JimRed

You should be governor.


21 posted on 01/03/2018 10:20:54 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

There’s no shortage of “conservatives” who game the government and jockey for position at the fed feed trough with the best of them.

600 acres of beets, corn, soybeans, cattle pasture? The “conservatives” will complain that it’s overtaxed.

600 acres of solar panels? The “conservatives” will be screaming from the rooftops about how unfair it is that they pay the same property tax rates as the farmers and undeveloped land owners pay.


22 posted on 01/03/2018 10:21:13 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Our taxpayers here are paying for that tax abatement, and they’re also paying for an increase in energy cost,”

You are free to show me that this plant stands on it's own two feet with no subsidies, but I doubt it. In any case it raises rates.

I haven't said any of that. But if that plant was "fossil fuel" it would provide cheaper power, and tax revenue. Forcing me to use inefficient power to assuage some lefty politicians "global warming" guilt is a "cost".

23 posted on 01/03/2018 10:48:21 AM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Should have been:

because calling lower taxes a cost is based on the assumption that the government is entitled to all your money and any they let you keep is a "cost". How else does lower taxes equate to a "cost"?

I haven't said any of that....

24 posted on 01/03/2018 10:51:24 AM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

Yep, good point. Both sides have their favored subsidy babies. Both sides like the cheap immigrants, though.


25 posted on 01/03/2018 11:47:43 AM PST by polymuser (Its terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

I’ve written this about religious groups getting tax abatement.

Losing property tax collections to a non-taxed entity isn’t really money lost. Real estate value is demand. Now, a religious institution like a church or even better a college raises demand, and therefore the sum real estate value in a jurisdiction. I doubt solar farms have that effect. But whatever loss of value they cause by taking land off the tax tables, they probably add an equal amount by increasing scarcity, and therefore value. This may not be helpful if the town reassesses your property, but it’s not lost tax revenue.

On the other hand, I’m not ENTIRELY sure that a solar farm doesn’t reduce demand.


26 posted on 01/03/2018 1:37:45 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson