Sorry, but this is about the swatter. But if you wish to start a thread to vent about your issues with police, feel free to do so.
Indeed it is about the swatter......who utilized reckless police action in an horrific crime.
Wrong. This is about an unarmed and entirely innocent American citizen murdered by the police.
That someone was able to successfully phone-in a police "hit" on someone says more about the state of law enforcement in this country than it does on the "swatter".
So, we'll just use this thread, thank you very much.
There was a time that the cop, or someone else, had to be in a reasonable threat of harm before lethal force was tolerated.
Now, reaching to pull up your pants is reason enough. I think that is an integral and inseparable part of this story.
I’ll post whatever I want, thanks.
“Sorry, but this is about the swatter. But if you wish to start a thread to vent about your issues with police, feel free to do so.”
NO, it isn’t. It’s about two wrongs not making a right! If no one had been killed by the stupid ASSWAT, there wouldn’t be an article about anything here! Talk about cognitive dissonance!
And why is swatting so enticing to those people? Because they know the danger to the person they swatted. It’s not like they called dominos pizza. They know cops will shoot if it’s a good swatting. ID10T
“Sorry, but this is about the swatter.“
That ain’t how it works, Skippy.
L