Posted on 12/30/2017 4:42:14 PM PST by Kaslin
“Making America Great Again” isn’t going to happen overnight. But, 2017 has surely been a good start. So, before leaping into the new year, let’s take a look back at what Republicans have accomplished. Here are seven major conservative wins worth celebrating.
Judicial Picks, Including - But Not Limited to - Justice Neil Gorsuch
In one of his first big acts as President, Trump selected Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. A little over two (rather tense) months later, the Senate confirmed Gorsuch’s nomination by a vote of 54-45, and, on April 10th, he was sworn in as the newest member of the High Court. Conservatives cheered - and rightfully so. Gorsuch is an outstanding pick.
He holds three academic degrees; he earned his B.A. from Columbia University, his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School and his doctorate in legal philosophy from Oxford University. He clerked for two Supreme Court justices, former Justice Byron White and current Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy (which also makes him the first to serve with his former boss). He, like Scalia, is a committed originalist and textualist, and has often been compared to the late Justice. He is well-respected throughout legal circles, especially for his superb writing skills. Even a number of liberals have acknowledged his impressive credentials. And let’s not forget the way he expertly handled himself at his confirmation hearing.
Overall, Gorsuch was a sound choice - and he’s not the only solid judicial nominee Trump has selected this year. While these lower court seats may not seem all that important, they matter…a lot. Townhall’s Guy Benson explains:
Despite the heavy media emphasis placed on the Supreme Court, thousands upon thousands of cases are decided and resolved at lower levels, which is why populating those courts with constitutionalists must be a priority.
And that’s why each seat filled, no matter how small, is a yet another huge win for conservatives.
Pulling Out of the Paris Climate Agreement
Back in June, President Trump put “America first,” as he so often promises, and formally withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement.
“In order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord,” he said in an announcement from the White House Rose Garden. “We will begin negotiations to re-enter either the Paris Accord, or an entirely new agreement.”
As expected, liberals lost it. But what many failed - or should we say still fail - to understand is that Trump’s decision really had nothing to do with climate science or the environment; it was about protecting America’s interests, specifically our financial interests.
“I will work to ensure America remains the world’s leader on environmental issues, but under a framework that is fair,” Trump said in the official announcement. “The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries.”
“No responsible leader can put the workers and the people of their country at this debilitating and tremendous disadvantage,” he added. “Withdrawing is in the economic interest and won't matter much to the climate.”
And he was right. Various analysts concluded that staying in the Paris Climate Agreement would mean higher energy costs for average Americans, fewer jobs, and overall less economic growth.
The Heritage Foundation breaks it down:
Companies will pass higher costs on to consumers or absorb the costs, which prevents hiring and new investment. As prices rise, consumers buy less, and companies will drop employees, close entirely, or move to other countries where the cost of doing business is lower. The result is fewer opportunities for American workers, lower incomes, less economic growth, and higher unemployment.
The U.S. may have been able to justify the cost if the agreement was going to significantly benefit the environment - but it wasn’t (via The Wall Street Journal):
The Big Con at the heart of Paris is that even its supporters concede that meeting all of its commitments won’t prevent more than a 0.17 degree Celsius increase in global temperatures by 2100, far less than the two degrees that is supposedly needed to avert climate doom.
In other words, the Accords are a joke. Even the “father of climate change awareness,” former NASA scientist James Hansen, called the Paris Agreement “bullsh*t.”
So, regardless of where you stand on climate change, or how much you think we should be doing to save the environment, pulling out of the Paris Accords was the right thing for America.
Significant Blows to ISIS
Throughout his campaign, Trump repeatedly vowed to defeat ISIS. Almost a year into the presidency, and Trump has (nearly) fulfilled that promise.
While ISIS and its toxic ideology has by no means been expunged from this earth, its dream of an Islamic caliphate is officially dead. The terror group has lost 98 percent of the territory it once held - half of which was taken back in just the first year of the Trump administration.
In July, Mosul, a major ISIS stronghold in Iraq since 2014, was finally recovered. And in October, Trump proudly announced the fall of Raqqah, the terror group’s self-proclaimed capital in Syria.
In a statement, the President said:
I am pleased to announce that the Syrian Democratic Forces, our partners in the fight against ISIS in Syria, have successfully recaptured Raqqah – the terrorist group’s self-proclaimed capital city. Together, our forces have liberated the entire city from ISIS control. The defeat of ISIS in Raqqah represents a critical breakthrough in our worldwide campaign to defeat ISIS and its wicked ideology. With the liberation of ISIS’s capital and the vast majority of its territory, the end of the ISIS caliphate is in sight.
During the liberation of the city, ISIS lost close to 6,000 fighters. And, according to the latest American intelligence, there are now less than 1,000 fighters left in Iraq and Syria; at its peak, there were nearly 45,000 in the region.
Now, as stated earlier, the war is not over. While the Islamic State might have been defeated militarily, its radical ideology is still very much alive. The terror group continues to recruit sympathizers around the globe through the internet and social media to carry out its attacks. In fact, some analysts are signaling the rise, of a “virtual caliphate,” something that seems much more difficult to target and track.
Hopefully, if the Trump administration continues down this path, these lone wolf attacks will become less frequent. But don’t expect to hear about it in the mainstream media - even a universal victory such as ISIS’s defeat will be ignored by the press if it means acknowledging that Trump did something right.
National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Passes in the House
Gun owners and Second Amendment advocates have had some significant wins - and losses - this year, but perhaps the most notable was the House's passage of H.R. 38, better known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.
According to the bill’s summary:
This bill amends the federal criminal code to allow a qualified individual to carry a concealed handgun into or possess a concealed handgun in another state that allows individuals to carry concealed firearms.
A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by any state or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in his or her state of residence.
In other words, H.R. 38 would allow anyone with a concealed carry permit to legally carry a concealed firearm in any state that recognizes concealed carry rights, which, as of 2014, is all 50. This means law-abiding gun owners can travel freely between states without having to worry about varying gun laws. More importantly, it means our Second Amendment rights - and, therefore, our ability to protect ourselves and our families - doesn’t end at state lines.
But, of course, anti-gun liberals don’t see it that way.
After the bill’s passage in the House, anti-gunners freaked, throwing out a number of lies about what they think the legislation will allow.
Hopefully, Democrats in the Senate do some research on existing guns laws and a vote on the bill is actually held in the upper chamber; 60 yay votes are needed for it to make it onto President Trump’s desk. There's still an uphill climb.
Concealed carry reciprocity is something gun rights activists have been pining after for years - and now, it’s within sight and discussion
Formally Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel
or years, United States presidents have promised to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and formally recognize the city as the undivided capital of the Jewish state. Clinton, Bush, Obama; all three failed to follow through. But on December 6th, President Trump made good on his promise and officially recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Many have accused the President of derailing the peace process and placing a two-state solution “out of reach.” But Trump’s decision to formally recognize Jerusalem wasn’t just symbolic - his way of announcing to the world who’s supposed side we’re on - it was strategic.
During a formal announcement from the Diplomatic Reception room at the White House, Trump said (emphasis added):
“I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. This is a long overdue step to advance the peace process...today, we finally acknowledge the obvious: that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. This is nothing more, or less, than a recognition of reality. It is also the right thing to do. It's something that has to be done.”
If Trump hadn’t made the move, then the stalemate between Israel and Palestine would continue. A two-state solution, the “ultimate deal” as Trump has called it, has always been just “out of reach,” because neither side is willing to budge. Perhaps this decision to formally recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital will put the “ultimate deal” back within reach.
It’s important to note that, while Trump has formally acknowledged that Jerusalem is the rightful, undivided capital of Israel, he has not yet moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv. However, as we’ve learned this year, Trump follows through on his promises. Moving the embassy will likely be no different.
Tax Reform
Well, it’s official. After passing in the House, the Senate and the House again, the GOP tax reform bill, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was signed into law by President Trump on December 22.
The $1.5 trillion plan, which will go into effect in February 2018, is the biggest overhaul of our tax system in over three decades. And, despite what Democrats have tried tirelessly to convince taxpayers, the new law doesn’t just benefit the rich.
More than 80 percent of Americans will receive a tax cut under the law, with less than five percent seeing an increase. More specifically, according to The Wall Street Journal, “a family of four earning the median income of $73,000 can expect a $2,059 tax cut.” That seems like a decent chunk of change to us.
The new law also lowers the corporate tax rate from 35 to 21 percent, bringing it on par with the rest of the developed world. Many Democrats feared corporations would simply use this extra cash to “line the pockets of shareholders.” Thankfully, they were (very) quickly proven wrong. Before President Trump even signed the bill into law, major companies - including AT&T, Comcast, Fifth Third Bancorp, Wells Fargo, and Boeing - praised the legislation and announced plans to reinvest in their workers. Many of these plans included bonuses for thousands of employees and an increase in workers’ minimum wage to $15 an hour.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has been labeled the biggest win for Republicans this year, but it’s more than that; it’s a win for every American who will now have extra cash in their pockets to put toward groceries, their children’s college savings, home improvements or whatever else they may need.
Economic Uptick
>Tax reform will surely lead to significant economic growth, but we won’t really see those effects until next year. So, let’s talk about the effects Trump has had on our economy this year. According to the numbers, we’re definitely moving in the right direction.
While the December jobs report has yet to be released, in November, 228,000 jobs were created. The month before, we saw 261,000 jobs added, a welcome surge after September, during which Texas was hit by Hurricane Harvey, Florida was hit by Irma and Puerto Rico was destroyed by Maria. Overall, 2.2 million jobs have been added this year.
The unemployment rate is the lowest it’s been in almost two decades at 4.1 percent, and consumer confidence is at a 17-year high. GDP growth is also on the rise; in the third quarter the growth rate hit 3.2 percent, and the fourth quarter is expected to hit 4 percent. And, let us not forget the stock market. The Dow Jones industrial average went up 5,000 points this year. That’s the biggest annual-points gain ever.
So yeah, you could say the economy is booming. Even CNN’s admitted it.
CNN’s Nia Malika Henderson: POTUS Is Right, The Economy Is Booming
Honorable Mentions
While all of the above are huge wins, they’re not the only Republican accomplishments this year.
Trump has rolled back a number of Obama-era regulations, saving billions in regulatory costs. Homeland Security put an end to the "catch-and-release" policy, a federal appellate court shut down D.C.’s “good reason” law for clearly violating our Second Amendment, the U.S. finally called out Iran for violating international law and NATO members for not contributing their fair share, and Nikki Haley firmly put the UN in its place following the Jerusalem decision. And this isn't even a full list.
Simply put, despite what some may want you to think, this year hasn't been all that bad. Here's to hoping 2018 is even better.
Why can’t McConnell just attach it to the budget and pass it with 51 votes like Reid did with obamacare and the R’s did with the tax cuts?
CA and NY keep state taxes high to avoid paying their share to the Feds. Not to mention, CA is a sanctuary state for foreign invaders that are also leaching off the rest of the states. You should reassess your stance.
Corporations are a primary business entity of free enterprise. If you are against them no one is forcing you to buy their products, are they? I amuse you don’t own any of their stock shares either?
Pay "their share to the Feds"?
Come on Neo. That is the rhetoric of Liberals, and I know you are not one.
I am NOT against corporations or businesses. Please don't put words in my mouth. I am against having my taxes raised so that they get a massive tax break. This isn't too hard to figure out. The GOPe picked winners and losers with the Tax Bill, rather than implementing fair and real Tax Reform.
I am also not against anyone's 410K or shares making money, and I am not against Capitalism.
What I object to is being told that I, and millions of us, are supposed to be happy by being screwed. We are not happy, and that's our right.
There are 24 House Republicans in NY, NJ, can CA alone. I expect us to lose at least some of those in 2018, perhaps the majority of them. The GOP made a political gamble with this tax bill. We will have to see what happens.
>> And who would those people be that are going to have a tax increase? The high tax states, maybe? If you are talking about Ca and NY, they deserve to pay their fair share. The low tax states have been subsidizing them for far too long.
The tax increases may hit more people in the high tax states but not all of those states are blue. As the map at this link shows, Iowa has a top state income tax rate of 8.98 percent. More importantly though, it's not just many taxpayers in states with high income taxes that will pay higher taxes. Many with high mortgage interest and/or property taxes will also be affected. As shown at http://usbudget.blogspot.com/2017/12/who-will-see-their-taxes-go-up-under_23.html, the "family of four earning the median income of $73,000" who "can expect a $2,059 tax cut", will only see an $11 tax cut if they have $37,500 in itemized deductions, regardless of whether or not those deductions are still allowed. If the two children are also older than 17, then the $11 tax cut becomes a $989 tax increase. Following is a graph showing the change in taxes for other levels of itemized deductions:
Still, the tax bill as a whole will add about $1.5 trillion to the debt over 10 years. That will be paid for by cuts in service and/or higher interest payments by our children. There is no free lunch.
I don’ t really want to argue with either one of you. The US had the highest corporate rate of all industrialized nations. The cut will stimulate job growth and the economy. I know it is far from perfect but it will fuel jobs and end the corporate move to other countries. I personally favor a national sales tax to replace the IRS jackboots, but that is unlikely to happen.
Jim Robinson did the calculations and as I recall he said otherwise. Last time I checked he is from CA. I haven’t personally calculated my own tax burden. I have to pay a CPA $600 every year to figure it out. SkyPilot thanks for defusing. Happy New Year
We still need that wall! Keep fighting for us!
Opened up ANWR! Drill bay, drill!
Israel is a questionable ally? Really? How so?
I am sure Trump wanted across the board tax cuts. He got what he could.
Nobody is subsidization anyone. All taxes are evil some pay more than others. It is all one big crap sandwich for the forgotten man/woman.
I don’t recall Israeli soldiers ever fighting beside the US. I do recall the USS Liberty incident.
Very true. Those high tax states voted heavily against General, er President Trump.
For your information Israel volunteered an entire division to Desert Shield/Storm but was refused by Bush I. Too political for that globalist asshole.
Happy New Year to you as well!
Very good information and graph. Thanks for posting.
How can this be true if you are the wealthy?
Very true. Those high tax states voted heavily against General, er President, Trump. I think the republicans crafted the bill for just a bit of payback. Don’t get me wrong, I know there are many fine conservative republicans in some of those states.
Ok,,but the statement I made remains true. They have never fought beside US troops like the Uk, Australia, S. Korea, and so goes the list. You didn’t address the USS Liberty incident?
They are not allowed too. Israel is friend and I visited there many times while in the military. F off loser. Anti Semitic much?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.