Posted on 12/21/2017 8:03:15 AM PST by RoosterRedux
To understand any phenomenon, its roots must first be understood. Unfortunately, not only do all discussions on the conflict between Islam and the West tend to be limited to the modern era, but when the past, the origins, are alluded to, the antithesis of reality is proffered.
We hear that the West -- itself an anachronism for Europe, or better yet, Christendom -- began the conflict by intentionally demonizing otherwise peaceful and tolerant Muslims and their prophet in order to justify their colonial aspirations in the East, which supposedly began with the Crusades. Bestselling author on Islam and Christianity Karen Armstrong summarizes the standard view: Ever since the Crusades, people in the west have seen the prophet Muhammad as a sinister figure. The scholar monks of Europe stigmatised Muhammad as a cruel warlord who established the false religion of Islam by the sword.
*snip*
That nothing could be further from the truth is an understatement. From the very first Christian references to Muslims in the Seventh Century to Pope Urbans call to the First Crusade more than four centuries later, the Saracens and their prophet were consistently abhorred.
Around 650, John of Nikiu wrote that Muslims -- the Copt is apparently the first non-Muslim to note that word -- were not just enemies of God but adherents of the detestable doctrine of the beast, that is, Mohammed.[i] The oldest parchment that alludes to a warlike prophet was written in 634 -- a mere two years after Muhammads death. It has a man asking a learned Jewish scribe what he knows about the prophet who has appeared among the Saracens. The elderly man, with much groaning, responded: He is deceiving. For do prophets come with swords and chariot?
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Check out his video, a taste of islam. Start at the 5:00 mark.
It makes extremely clear why islam is truly evil to the core and dangerous everywhere it exists.
I have watched just about all Stephen Coughlin video lectures. He’s great.
Will do.
I certainly agree.
Yet we see that the last video I linked tohas but 33k views. And I may have watched it entirely or “viewed” it just to link to it on a number of occasions for either.
How many like you or I have really even seen these videos? The number of views should be in the millions, not thousands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.