Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
If that's not a forgery, I don't know what is. In fact, it's a deliberate, criminal forgery.

Adding the inscription isn't forgery. Adding "Moore" at the end is. That's why nobody is pressing her on how much exactly she added.


30 posted on 12/09/2017 12:28:37 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

Note the different angles of the lines of writing on each side of that yellow line.

Saw a pic last night where someone had drawn straight lines under them.

That’s what sealed it for me, even moreso than the ink


35 posted on 12/09/2017 12:37:57 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
To me it looks as though the connection between the letters "a" and "y" in the word "say" is very similar to the signature which would make Roy into Ray and as someone has pointed out make the whole thing rhyme.

To this armchair amatuer this looks like a very bad forgery the "o" in the word could connect differently than it does in the Signature

But we knew all this

48 posted on 12/09/2017 12:46:24 PM PST by datricker (Cut Taxes Repeal ACA Deport DACA - Americans First, Build the Wall, Lock her up MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

However we can get hung up on words here. She “altered” the document and to many this clasifies what she did as a forgery.

But she also is lying about when she did it. I hope we will eventually learn that the addition was not done until Allred explained that to be useful, the note would have to have elements that clearly implicated Roy Moore (simply the first name would not do) and would have to tie him to the restaurant and the date when she would be under age. (the added notes do this nicely but the “DA” confuses things until we learn that that is how Roy Moore’s assistant initialed off when she used a signature stamp. This stamp was used on the signature of the divorce settlement many years later. I doubt that Moore actually signed his name like the stamp back when he was 32.


134 posted on 12/09/2017 3:39:44 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Trump has one good idea after the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

The more I look at that, the more the o in Roy looks like an a.


143 posted on 12/09/2017 4:06:33 PM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68

I would also add that the inscription is part of the forgery.

Ordinarily, I would agree with you, but in this case, adding the inscription is a material alteration because this now “places” (attempts to place) Moore at the restaurant.

Black’s law dictionary says this is a textbook forgery.


150 posted on 12/09/2017 4:22:25 PM PST by NOVACPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68
Adding the inscription isn't forgery. Adding "Moore" at the end is.

Have you noticed how the forgery is being reported as "Beverly Young Nelson told ABC News she amended an inscription from Moore in her high school yearbook, adding the date and location."

They conveniently leave out that she also added last last name, as is evident by the color change between "Roy" and "Moore."

-PJ

191 posted on 12/10/2017 4:02:41 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson