Josh Blackman spends a lot of time lauding what is going on here, specifically explaining step by step why these things are so good.
By the end, you’d expect him to laud Trump too, without whom none of this would have happened. Imagine Hillary in the Oval office. Shudder to think of the difference. All these things would be headed in the exact opposite direction.
But no, Blackman trashes Trump based on his use of Twitter.
If ignorance is truly bliss, this guy should be happy as can be, and real proud of himself.
President Trump is putting the lie to all the things said about him and his “dangerous” incompetence.
He’s excellent for the economy. He’s excellent for the rule of law. He’s excellent when it comes to Constitutional matters. He’s excellent when it comes to separation of powers. He’s proven himself to be excellent on foreign policy to this point.
The man gets it better than any president in the last 150 years.
Now,... back to blasting him for his use of Twitter!
This Josh Blackman, being smart enough to recognize a massive sea change headed in the right direction, he can’t muster the courage to give credit where credit is due.
Nope, gotta trash Trump because this all is supposedly happening by accident.
Blackman, you ignorant slut!
That’s the real thing isn’t it. If the criminal hag had won; the country would have continued to spiral down until the last flush wasn’t even heard.
With Trump we have the right people in charge of restoring what this country was designed to run on. The left always thinks it can improve on our US Constitution by finding loopholes in it to push their narrative, meme’s, and Marxist agenda.
As usual; the left is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I’m concerned about one of his picks though. The female for DHS sec. She is pro-DACA. That is NOT someone we want in charge of protecting our borders and homeland. She needs to be replaced ASAP. I can’t believe Trump or one of his staff made this fatal error in judgment.
I thought it was an excellent article and out of its entirety there was what a singular paragraph critical of the President where the remainder lauded him?
One that is critical of actions or policy does not make he/she anti anything. I’d much rather have a constitutionalist (as is evidenced with this author) critical of something (rightly so) than a consummate yes man. Otherwise just equip him with Pom poms and line him up with the litany of other clapping seals awaiting their fish.
This was an excellent article
I still harbor deep concerns about the rule of law in America today. As reflected solely by President Trump’s Twitter feed, I worry about his inappropriate attacks on the judiciary, calls for the prosecution of his political opponents, taunts of foreign dictators, delegitimization of the press, and failure to address sexual and other improprieties in his own party, to say nothing of our stark policy differences. With respect to the separation of powers, however, if the Trump administration actually follows through on its promises concerning delegation, due process, and deference, there will be a sea change in how the administrative state functions. Indeed, each of these actions will, ironically enough, weaken the executive and restore the separation of powers in the long run. That alone would be a remarkable disruption of the status quo.He is just not thrilled with some of our president's tweets. Well frankly, neither am I. So what? Do you really require 100% agreement for patriotism? That's not patriotism. That's cultism. And cultism is not conservatism, nor patriotism, nor Americanism.