>>Let’s be frank: Hunters know that high-capacity magazines and semi-automatic rifles are unnecessary for our sport.
There are FReepers who believe this too. Had a lengthy argument with one last week who seemed to think that you don’t need an AR-15. You just need more range time. smh
I believe it, because it’s true. They aren’t “necessary” for the sport. GUNS aren’t necessary for the sport of hunting. NONE of this has anything to do with the 2nd Amendment.
Yep. I know a lot of Fudds. They definitely tend to skew older.
LMAO at gun control advocates who think they'll have success of they trot out grandpa with his rusty old bolt action to bleat against assault weapons to a younger generation who couldn't care less about hunting as they buy up the cool black rifles from "Call of Duty."
Did you tell him that it is the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs?
2nd ammendment doesn’t have any reference to hunting in it. I have never read one Real study Proving with out a doubt that bear spray is more effective than my SBH.
Hell!
“HUNTING” is not “necessary.”