Posted on 11/25/2017 7:06:38 AM PST by Simon Green
Lets be frank: Hunters know that high-capacity magazines and semi-automatic rifles are unnecessary for our sport. These guns are weapons of war, designed to kill human beings. You could say the same about handguns. My dad often talks about bringing a sidearm for protection while hunting in serious grizzly bear country, but I tell him not to bother. Studies have shown that bear spray is more effective, anyway, and theres a good deal less collateral damage likely to be caused. Greg Luther in Hunters, sportsmen must speak up now on gun control [via abqjournal.com]
>>Yep. I know a lot of Fudds. They definitely tend to skew older.
I had never heard of the term “Fudds” before. Very appropriate term for them.
Actually, it took a low/intermediate powered rifle. Texas bans the use of 5.56/.223 for deer hunting because it’s *not powerful enough* to humanely kill a deer.
Which is why my “oh, s**t” rifle is in 7.62x51.
The 2nd amendment is not about “need” or hunting. It is a right.
This thread is AWESOME.
I’m writing these gems down so I can use them conversationally. I have to go and practice.
Fudds....
I feel sorry for them.
Well snowflake (that is you, and absolutely you have fully earned the moniker) hunting isn’t necessarily “a sport.” Sometimes it is a necessary chore required to keep an agricultural business functional.
You are dismissed. Come back when you have at least a vague understanding of the topic, instead of the smarmy pretentiousness you have been exhibiting.
This line of thinking worked out so well for Jim Zumbo.
That phrase, and it's equivalents, ALWAYS precede an attempt to deceive.
While you obviously posted that sarcastically, I've seen many s person say virtually those exact words in all seriousness.
Somebody calls me a Fudd will likely have their choice of having their nose broken or a knee in an area that will make them uncomfortable for the next few days or both. My great uncle had a lever action 32-40 rifle that probably would have done serious human carnage in a year like 1920 if it were to have been in the hands of a sick, deranged person.
The left knows that if they tell a lie often enough, it will become accepted fact. The MSM feels it is their job to create national perception.
The little homosexual would crap his pants if he fired a gun.
Look up;
Mike Vanderbough...
Sipsey Street Irregulars
>>While you obviously posted that sarcastically, I’ve seen many s person say virtually those exact words in all seriousness.
And when some fool starts telling me that anything more modern than a bolt-action rifle is not a hunting weapon, I tell them those exact words in all seriousness.
When they tell me that my AR-15 is only good for killing people, I reply with, “I sure hope so. That’s what the 2nd Amendment is all about.”
If you like "traditional" long guns but want to ban handguns, "assault" weapons, or "high" capacity magazines....you're a Fudd. If you just like the former but don't want to restrict the latter, you're not.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Just how many Americans do these idiots think would ever submit to more illegal restrictions or controls anyway? ( which work so very well in Chicago and Detroit and Baltimore and and and anyway). /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.