Posted on 11/19/2017 7:47:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Tuesday we learned that the GOP had decided to add repeal of Obamacare’s individual mandate to the tax bill which is still under consideration in the Senate. The immediate question was whether the same Senators who balked at various iterations of Obamacare repeal would also consider repeal of the mandate a deal breaker. One of those Senators being closely watched is Lisa Murkowski. Earlier today, Murkowski told Roll Call that her vote on the tax bill would depend on Alexander-Murray, a bipartisan plan which would restore cost-sharing payments to insurers.
“I think that there is a path and I think the path is a reasonable path,” Murkowski said of her support for the measure. “If the Congress is going to move forward with repeal of the individual mandate, we absolutely must have the Alexander-Murray piece that is passed into law.”
Without such a measure — which would, among other things, appropriate money for so-called cost-sharing subsidies — Murkowski says middle-class Americans may not receive the kind of tax relief the GOP is aiming to provide.
“There is a path forward. It just means that some who have said some nasty things about CSRs are maybe just going to have to acknowledge that, well, this might be the way that you thread this needle,” she said. “If that tax cut is offset by higher premiums, you haven’t delivered benefit.”
So it seemed pretty clear Murkowski was saying the GOP could only have her vote to repeal the mandate if cost-sharing payments resumed. But later on Friday, Murkowski backed away from that. In a statement posted on Facebook she wrote that the passage of Alexander-Murray was not necessarily a precondition for her vote on the tax bill:
I have consistently said that passing Alexander/Murray is important to stabilizing the individual market and it may be particularly so if the individual mandate is repealed as included in the draft reported by the Senate Finance Committee last night.
However, one should not assume this is a precondition for my support for the tax bill.
Like many of my colleagues, I am reviewing the good work of the Finance Committee over the Thanksgiving Holiday. I plan to look at the entire package before coming to any conclusion on the legislation.
So if we’re reading the tea leaves here, it seems that Murkowski is 1) leaving her options as open as possible and 2) not ruling out voting for the tax bill containing the individual mandate repeal even if cost-sharing payments aren’t part of that bargain (though she still believes that would be better). Meanwhile, Sen. John McCain had some positive comments about the tax bill today. From Business Insider:
“I applaud Chairman Hatch and the Senate Finance Committee in taking another step forward in providing much-needed tax relief for hardworking American families,” McCain said in a statement. “I am pleased that the Finance Committee has followed the regular order by holding numerous hearings and spending four days debating the bill and considering amendments in committee.”
One of McCain’s primary gripes during the effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act was that his fellow Republicans were circumventing the regular order by which the Senate does its business. McCain ultimately voted against the “skinny repeal” effort in June, and his disapproval of a subsequent bill spearheaded by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Bill Cassidy helped derail that as well.
So Sen. McCain seems to be happy, at least for the moment, and Sen. Murkowski seems to have retracted her concern somewhat. What about the third musketeer? Sen. Collins has expressed concern about including mandate repeal in the tax bill. This obviously isn’t a done deal yet but there’s at least some reason to think it could work out differently than last time. We’ll know more after Thanksgiving.
Murkowski can be bought.
No problem.
Just ask Sarah Palin.
Tease. Doesn’t have the looks anymore.
What exactly would repeal of the individual mandate mean in terms of the cost and availability of other forms of coverage?
Any mandated purchase is unconstitutional anyway. Heck, 0bama’s entire presidency was unconstitutional.
Shocking I tell ya! Oh, never mind.... Uh, lease-uh, pound sand.
Cost sharing = bail out
No
LOL, Kabuki theater at its finest. “Reviewing it over the holiday?!?!” Uh-huh, they just need to consult with each other so that several “no” vote blocks form that are diametrically opposed to each other. That way there will be no satisfying 50 senators in the Senate. McCain can get the satisfaction of thumbing it down again just to be the final act in the Kabuki play.
Part of the “its our party and if we can’t run it, then we will destroy it and blame Trump” cabal.
This is the NeverTrump strategy. They tell you that fillowing the GOPe is the only way the party can win. They tell you that supporting the “insurgent” candidate is bad because that candidate can’t win or will destroy the party. When we do support that candidate and that candidate wins, they sabotage them (acting as if they aren’t and we are too stupid to realize that they are). Then they have the chutzpah to turn to us and tell us, “see, we told you idiots so!!”
The same is being played out here. They will sabotage Trump, endure electoral disaster (maybe get Trump impeached) and then turn to us and say, wait for it, “see, we told you so.”
If you don't do it now...you'll be fighting over it for years.
Murkowski is the ultimate political hooker. Give some pork and she’ll appear in your next dossier
She has already been bought with oil leases for Alaska. Maine doesn’t have much to be offered except maybe fishing limits being eased.
If legislation opening up ANWR for oil production is added to tax reform, she will vote for it. Read that may just happen (ANWR).
Alaska, less than a million people, thirty billion in debt, state retirements underfunded worse than Califorbia, now stealing the PFD which was the people’s oil payment for giving up mineral rights. Lisa ran as independent and was voted in by Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.