[plain talk]

LOL - The writer of this piece assumes that Moore wrote the entry in the yearbook but wisely did not sign it and only years later the woman added Moore’s forged signature and other identifying data. That’s even more far fetched than Allred’s statement that all the writing on the page was Moore’s. You can’t make this stuff up!

Yeah that was a bit strange. It is interesting to see how people think .. or not think. Whoever wrote the note likely signed their name as Roy as the note and Roy are in the handwriting and ink. What was added in a different ink and handwriting was last name Moore, DA, date and location.

The yearbook evidence means nothing. Even if you somehow explain away the different ink and handwriting they can't prove Roy signed it and it wasn't forged. So we have a stand-off and a he said / she said. The voters have to decide.

[bk1000]

“Yeah that was a bit strange. It is interesting to see how people think .. or not think. Whoever wrote the note likely signed their name as Roy as the note and Roy are in the handwriting and ink.”

Others have said it looks more like “Ray”, and there was a Ray in her class. It looks like just the last name was added. Adding the DA was the tip-off.

[Ozark Tom]

Forensic chemical analysis of the ink for composition and retained solvent fraction should help pinpoint the age of the writing.