Posted on 11/13/2017 8:13:31 PM PST by Kazan
Known for his insightful take on politics, journalist and author Thomas Wictor believes Judge Roy Moores signature in Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelsons yearbook is a forgery.
Wictors shock claim are highlighted by four anomalies laid out below.
Photos at link
The sevens in 1977 to the right of Christmas, are very different from the sevens in the date (12-22-77) above Old Hickory House.
Look at the two versions of the number 7, tweeted Wictor.
12-22-77 and Olde Hickory House were written by a different person, he added.
Next, Wictor points out the R and y in Roy, are not written the same way.
The inflection of the Y is more pronounced in Moore signature as Chief Justice. The R is noticeably longer in the signature of Chief Justice, as well.
I wonder who is paying Gloria AllCommie (aka Allred)? I bet all of these ladies don’t have the money for that witch.
Have to admit - it sure looks like a fake signature was added - why use “1977” in the missive and then a xx-xx-xx format in the signature?
Neither side wants Moore in the senate, neither the Dims OR the RINOs.
This is a crucial seat, in the Senate. McYertle doing his d@mnedest to throw balance to Dims., since his hand picked Globalist lost.
Yes, that seems to be the case. But the owner of the yearbook, who actually worked at that restaurant, got the name wrong. Very suspicious. Was that inscription added later, maybe last week?
Wicker lays out a good case.Who comes out with this stuff after 40 years.Liars
https://tttthreads.com/thread/930229004765822976
Also, I never printed the date when I signed a yearbook. It's like they are trying to set the time frame. It's not conclusive but strange to me.
I don't care if he was a five-year old transgender. His point stands.
That the signature appears to be forgery is what matters. ?
Moore needs to bring in a handwriting expert to back the point up.
But so what? It's a routine message you would write in an autograph in a restaurant to a cute girl you didn't know very well. There's nothing creepy about it. And I don't find 40-year-old memories particularly credible, nor do I find the accusations, even if true, to be particularly serious--given that they obviously were not followed by a criminal career like that of, say, Clinton or Menendez. Just a multi-decade marriage.
Ride on, Judge! Drive the swamp crazy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.