Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hot Tabasco

If he would have only used bear spray, the bear would be alive and the warden would be either mauled or killed.

But the bear would be alive!

The message to tourists is that bear spray keeps the bears alive! But bear spray MIGHT BE 90% effective in stopping a bear attack. Might be.


4 posted on 11/11/2017 3:41:59 AM PST by politicianslie (Lying to Americans is easy-Presstitutes listen to what they are told to say and they repeat it 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: politicianslie

Of course the sprayed bear needs some distance to halt its charge and might accidentally skid to a stop on top of the sprayer ... at which point nature will kick in, spray or no.


12 posted on 11/11/2017 4:01:54 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: politicianslie

“But bear spray MIGHT BE 90% effective in stopping a bear attack.”

A gun may only be 50% effective. My understanding is their CNS must be completely destroyed to get them to instantly keel over. I’ve read where they will run an additional 100 yards or worse yet kill the shooter after their heart was blown out.

My opinion is to shoot first, spray later if it keeps on coming. At least you can reassure yourself you tried everything while being mauled to death.


39 posted on 11/11/2017 7:20:38 AM PST by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson