Very sad that people are this stupid. No laughing matter...but what else can you do?
The global warming scam is not about warming or mitigating warming. It is about government takeover of the means of production....use of energy.
Those marine clouds might turn the soil of Britain and Alaska salty.
Acid rain was a problem in Europe and upstate New York decades ago.
Cities and paved roads drastically alter the natural albedio of the earth quite a bit more than the ‘experts’ tell us.
funny how the global warming morons aren’t advocating a program to dismantle the cities they all just LOVE to live in....
Instead they would rather dismantle the rurual live by destroying the internal combustion engines that help to power the food production those fools in the cities rely so heavily upon...
Trees can grow quite big in 30 to 40 years.
New types of trees might be genetically developed that have roots that rot slowly, storing CO2 safely and cheaply for hundreds of years.
There are many volcanoes in Atarctica that are quietly heating up the ground and melting the ice. Depending on who you talk to and what articles you read it might happen soon or it might take a while. Yet the moron scientists still say that it is man made. Here is one of many links on this subject.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/12/scientists-discover-91-volcanos-antarctica
NO.
Let’s even accept the non “consensus” theory that humans have messed horribly with the climate with our production and atmospheric release of CO2 (which I do not accept as the only or “major” cause of “climate change”).
Now if you are of that mind would you accept that humans can INTENTIONALLY mess with the climate and are so G-d awful smart that can be no unforeseen ill consequences? No. The two theories cannot be rationally connected.
And even if you are like myself, NOT believing that human activity totally explains “climate change”, then would you even consider scientists intentionally messing with it? No.
A more appropriate question is can society save itself from too many scientists with too much time on their hands; so much that they can concoct all kinds of cockamamie theories and ask people to take them seriously.
“Actual funding...Congress”
The greens do like the green stuff.
making clouds whiter rather than blacker? That’s racist
Global warming does not frighten me; I have spent a lot of time with the actual (raw) data. The physics is clear. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and will warm the planet. The coefficients and feedback loops are obscure. How much warming do we get, and how much does the planet resist change.
Geoengineering scares me to death. If we change the albedo (reflective coefficient) of our clouds, ice, or some other large portion of our planet, that will certainly change global temperatures. We know how large the initial change will be - opposite but equal in magnitude to the “warming disaster” we want to avert. For a sufficiently large remedial action, that could trigger a new path in global temperatures, an ice age. Geoengineering our way out of an ice age may not be as easy as triggering one.
Says the scientist that can’t model clouds or account for cloud coverage in their models...
the annuaki used Gold Dust. How about we try that?
“Ever-higher temperatures are melting the ice sheets faster than projected. Sea level is rising. “
uh, yeah. prove it.
“She swallowed the bird to catch the spider;
She swallowed the spider to catch the fly;
I don’t know why she swallowed a fly - Perhaps she’ll die!”
Maybe “progressives” should just breath less - a LOT less.