Posted on 11/08/2017 11:54:26 AM PST by SJackson
Edited on 11/08/2017 12:28:53 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
There seems to be a general consensus in Washington that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
(Excerpt) Read more at foreignpolicy.com ...
Let it be so.
Is John McCain still editor there?
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
“Unlike that Biblical figure, however, he has his father’s support and has taken care to arrest anyone who might threaten his drive to preeminence.”
In other words, he’s not really like Adonijah.
And the NeoCon traitors at FP don’t want their Iranian moneypot squeezed, do they?
Bttt.
5.56mm
Is this a legit outlet or another Lying Leftist outlet?
NRO or FP, what’s the real difference?
MBS is rolling up the Saudi ISIS leadership in Saudi Arabia now that their fighters in Syria are dead and their partners in Washington are either out of power or losing power
And it looks a lot like a plan to squeeze Iran - Good
Saudi Crown Prince is working to eliminate Wahabbi influence over Saudi government
Working to create secret alliance against Iran with Israel and US
This is FP, published by the Council of Foreign Relations, which is stocked with bitter Never Trumper NeoCons that backed the Obama-Corker raw deal with Iran.
If I was stuck in Iran, I’d be looking for a container load of potassium iodide pills.
There is nothing to indicate such a thing.
What is obvious is that there are forces in action in S.A. that could reform Islam and bring it into the 21st century.
This requires walking a tightrope to avoid being assassinated by the fundamentalist Moslems.
It is clear that the increase in Iranian military actions are intended to surround S.A. with pro-Iranian (i.e. shi’a) regimes with the eventual goal of taking over the whole company.
This is part of a struggle which has existed for 1300+ years within the Islamic world.
It is reported that FP ("Foreign Policy") is published by the Council of Foreign Relations, "which is stocked with bitter Never Trumper NeoCons that backed the Obama-Corker raw deal with Iran".
If that is true, why post this junk? If this story is true and has some redeeming value, at least get the story from a relatively reliable source, not from a known Lying Leftist operative posing as a “news” organization.
LOL
Right...
What is NRO?
cross link to here:
“Saudis, Iran on path to ‘very, very bloody’ war”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3602854/posts
New Republic Online.
The Weekly Standard could also be substituted for either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.