Posted on 11/08/2017 10:51:37 AM PST by JP1201
Here is an often-used tactic to defend government police organizations from criticism. Whenever critics point out abusive tactics of police officers, defenders counter with: "And yet you won't refuse police help the next time there's a robber in your house!" This, we are told, illustrates that all police critics are "hypocrites."
This has always been a dishonest tactic, of course, since "consumers" of police "services" are forced to pay for the local monopoly police force, and have no other options. Government police forces have monopolized the marketplace and crowded out many private security services. Thus, calling the police to scare off some robbers on one's property is no more hypocritical than a critic of the local power company who nevertheless turns on a lightbulb. It's simply a matter of making do with a high-priced, low-quality monopolist when no competition is allowed.
Just how low these low-quality services are has become more apparent in recent months.
In the wake of yesterday's church shooting in Texas, for example, private citizens were the ones who shot back at the assailant, and then chased him down in a high speed pursuit. The police did nothing but write some reports afterward.
A few months earlier, as violence escalated during the Charlottesville riot in Virginia, the law enforcement agencies stood back and did little except crash a helicopter in the woods.
Worst of all, of course, is the fact that it took police an hour and 12 minutes to respond to the Las Vegas shooter who killed more than fifty people as he opened fire on a crowd near the Las Vegas strip. Although hotel security had reported the location of the gunman — who had shot a security guard — even before the shooting began, local police agencies waited more than hour before entering the shooter's room. It remains unclear why the shooter stopped shooting after only about ten minutes, but we do know that he would have been free to keep shooting for a much, much longer period of time.1
Among advocates for private firearms ownership, the old joke is that "when seconds matter, the police are only minutes away." In Las Vegas at least, the saying could be "when second matter, the police are only an hour (or more) away."
Defenders of the police, of course, will claim that an hour of preparation was necessary in order to protect "officer safety." But this also tells you a lot about how government police function: while a gunman is raining down gunfire upon a crowd of people, it's officer safety that comes first, not citizen safety.
These are just some more recent examples. A multitude of historical examples remain, as well, including the Columbine school shooting in which local police agencies did nothing but seal off the area while the shooters remained untouched inside the school. The students and faculty trapped inside the school were on their own.
One might also point to the Waco Texas massacre in which police agencies, claiming to be rescuing women and children from the cultist David Koresh, decided to burn most of them to death instead.
None of this should surprise us.
It is established policy in the United States that police agencies have no duty to protect citizens, and are not liable for any harm that comes to citizens due to police inaction. In other words, the taxpayers are required to pay for "protection" from police. But the police aren't required to actually provide services. One can only imagine the howls we'd hear if any private industry were allowed to function in a similar way.
So, we shouldn't expect any reform or any other measure that will hold police accountable for doing so little to engage and stop violent criminals in times of extreme crisis.
If anything, we should expect police agencies to call for the taxpayers to pay even more for more police services. This, of course, is what happened in the wake of September 11, 2001. One of the worst security failures in American history — a failure allowed by the most well-funded security and police agencies in the world — did not lead to questions of whether Americans are actually getting their money's worth for the generous budgets that go year after year to federal law enforcement agencies. Instead, we were all told the taxpayers should be prepared to shell out even more money and give up even more of their freedoms.
The same is true of local police agencies. Police departments are ever hungry for more funding, for combat vehicles to use against the local population, and for more firepower.
But even when police are armed and equipped to teeth, arrests for petty drug offenses remain the priority, while car thefts, rapes, and assaults produce few arrests. As the police response to the riots on Ferguson Missouri showed, police are happy to protect government buildings and government property. Everyone else, it seems, is on his own.
When seconds count, the police are minutes away.
The armed citizen is the first responder.
The 5 rules of a gun fight:
1) gun beats no gun
2) a hit beats a miss
3) fast beats slow
4) big holes beat small holes
5) multiple holes beat a single hole
First step in the clean up, when a law enforcement agency loses in court and has to pay, it MUST come from that agencies pension fund.
Change is never going to happen when taxpayers are the ones on the hook for police mistakes or misdeeds.
Again!
Guys and Gals w/Guns are our best/only bet ~ The more POTUS.45 publicly and vigorously shows his support for this the more Guys/Gals/Guns will be out there for the folks!
No response time, No Calls for BackUp, No chain of command, No complex procedures, Etc, Etc.
The ONLY answer and it ain’t Gubmint, Police, or any other ineffective means!
Government police forces have monopolized the marketplace and crowded out many private security services
First step in the clean up, when a law enforcement agency loses in court and has to pay, it MUST come from that agencies pension fund.
Not entirely on my own; there’s us three — me, Smith and Wesson.
—Clint Eastwood in Sudden Impact; one of the great lines ever.
The police were ordered to "Stand Down" as last I knew..
and were then pulled back after cutting off all other means of exit.
This forced the "running of the gauntlet" where one side was attacked by an armed opposing side.
This was a planned and ordered governmental incident;
it did not occur by happenstance !
Works for me.
911 is is the government’s idea of dial a Prayer.
Oh, we’re getting our money’s worth from Bobby Mueller, who is going to throw Nevertrumper enemies in jail on the taxpayer’s dime, lots of them.
Do not be surprised if there are more security companies are started with a focus on protecting churches.
The Big Lie is that the government can ensure our safety. The left pushes the myth to defend its big government agenda. The only thing government does well is oppress its citizens.
And just as a precaution, they should have
metal detectors at the church’s front door,
you know, to make sure everybody is packing. ;)
“The 5 rules of a gun fight:.....”
and might I add..... Rule No.6 Be sure to empty the entire clip.
I will survive or go out in a blaze of glory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
