Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facebook estimates 200 million users may be fake: report
The Hill ^

Posted on 11/04/2017 9:34:13 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: grania

Clinton lawyer Marc Elias represented Facebook in 2011 when it got itself exempted from the requirement that ads contain info about who paid for them.


21 posted on 11/04/2017 9:52:33 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I think FB manipulates the count for advertisers so they'll have to pay for those fakes to "electronically see" their advertisements. FB likely generates fake perusal, generating leavings, such IP addresses, when such-and-so ad was "seen", etc. just in case they should ever be sued.

In reality, I don't think those fakes actually peruse, though the counters go up as a result. FB is not so dumb as to not have "pretend proof," however, IMHO. Advertisers beware! Decisions on whether advertising dollars are we spent on FB need to be on the basis of increased revenue, not vaprous hit counts that often may mean nothing at all (other than that FB's cash registers have rung).

22 posted on 11/04/2017 9:55:11 AM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I signed up once anonymously and never came back.
I wanted to see what it was about and was not interested especially after all the damn notices.
23 posted on 11/04/2017 9:55:39 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

All our pets have FB accounts.


24 posted on 11/04/2017 9:57:17 AM PDT by PeteB570 ( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I guess now they will be reimbursing advertisers for inflated numbers.


25 posted on 11/04/2017 10:05:54 AM PDT by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey playoffs season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If print media inflate their circulation numbers to increase ad revenues, it’s a criminal fraud. I don’t know how this is any different.


26 posted on 11/04/2017 10:05:55 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

>>The message does seem to be that they assumed the rules didn’t apply to FB, Twitter, and Google.

Given they were operating at the time under an Obama Just-us Department, and expected to then be under a Clinton one, why would they assume the rules did apply to them?


27 posted on 11/04/2017 10:06:59 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rx

What you’re saying is that the advertising is priced on audience size rather than views, and that in turn is based on historic perusals, which FB manipulates. Then size is viewed as a proxy for views, which in turn is used as a proxy for conversion to sales.

Once such a relation has been established, it can be gamed for revenue, until advertisers realize their returns are dropping and it gets repriced.


28 posted on 11/04/2017 10:09:20 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sure they might just be “virtual users”.

But there is no denying that they are loyal and reliable democrat voters too.


29 posted on 11/04/2017 10:09:46 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Libtards wish anarchy and death for others, but exempt themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is news.What % of google and all other ISP’s account bogus.
I can speak for 1 multimillionth if thats a word, on FB


30 posted on 11/04/2017 10:10:18 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I get daily friend requests from people, usually attractive women, that I don’t know. When i look at their friends, it usually has no other friends. I don’t accept friend requests from people I don’t know and have only a few hundred friends.


31 posted on 11/04/2017 10:18:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rx
"I think those fake people's "like" leavings were largely computer-generated by Facebook."

It's the perfect crime!


32 posted on 11/04/2017 10:20:05 AM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

a stupid question, admittedly, but why would anyone create or use a fake account? i am obviously missing something important here....? thanks!


33 posted on 11/04/2017 10:20:22 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I had an account under a pseudonym. Is that considered fake? I have read that a fake name allows you to more carefully screen people you allow to friend you.

It was all for naught as I got bored with the whole concept. I can count my number of close friends on one hand and if I want to visit, I just pick up the phone.

34 posted on 11/04/2017 10:21:31 AM PDT by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

There are privacy settings.


35 posted on 11/04/2017 10:38:50 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I’d like to know how many Fakebook users are actually dead. I mean how would you make any distinctions between actime accounts, light users and all-the-rest.

A buddy of mine has like 3 FB accounts. I’m guessing he forgets his password and just starts over.


36 posted on 11/04/2017 10:49:45 AM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I am pretty sure that old-school patriot, leftist pride and Damocles aren’t real names of people, yet they are aliases on Facebook.


37 posted on 11/04/2017 10:54:12 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

ANd why Cant my Cat have its own Fakebook acct???

maybe b/c I dont have a Cat. : P


38 posted on 11/04/2017 10:59:31 AM PDT by Gasshog (When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

I have a provocateur account. It if very useful. But it is not fake, the comments are real. Actually the identity is more real than pResident Obola’s.


39 posted on 11/04/2017 11:00:58 AM PDT by cyberstoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

My best friend died 4 years ago and still has an active account, two weeks ago I got a notice of his birthday. How do you get those accounts deactivated?


40 posted on 11/04/2017 11:01:51 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson