Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Short excerpt of a very long article.

Editor's Note: Satter's father, David Satter, is an author and Russia specialist who has been critical of the Russian government. Several of his emails were published last year by hackers and his address is on Secureworks' list.

1 posted on 11/03/2017 12:18:00 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Fantasy.


2 posted on 11/03/2017 12:25:08 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That’s not a hack, that’s an idiot falling for a phishing scheme


3 posted on 11/03/2017 12:26:29 PM PDT by sharkhawk (Chelsea Dagger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Seth Rich


4 posted on 11/03/2017 12:28:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Fake News. It was Seth Rich, not the Russians.


5 posted on 11/03/2017 12:29:25 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Not that long of a read, unless one is mostly a Headline Drive-by Poster (like me, generally...).

Much detail in a timeline to be examined.


6 posted on 11/03/2017 12:31:08 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A story with no sources or facts. ok


7 posted on 11/03/2017 12:31:44 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Within nine days, some of the campaign's most consequential secrets would be in the hackers' hands, part of a massive operation aimed at vacuuming up millions of messages from thousands of inboxes across the world.

Did the Russians put tens of thousands of confidential US Govt emails onto Anthony Wiener's laptop?

8 posted on 11/03/2017 12:33:21 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hacking? Sounds more like Podesta was phished, ie, punked through sheer stupidity. And his emails ended up in “Russian-linked” hands whatever that means. Someone who “shares Russian interests?”

That’s where all the “Russian hacking” B/S started. No evidence whatsoever. Hillary had Russia on her brain because of her own dirty dealings with them. She probably figured they were double-crossing her.


9 posted on 11/03/2017 12:33:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

There was NO RUSSIAN HACKING!! 😁 🤣 😄

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack



Russiagate Is More Fiction Than Fact



Bombshell Report on the DNC Hack by Forensic Experts Claims It Was an Inside Job, Not the Russians

10 posted on 11/03/2017 12:37:16 PM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"A snake was seen on the grounds of the DNC"

The place is infested with them.

11 posted on 11/03/2017 12:40:30 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Russians wanted Bernie elected.


12 posted on 11/03/2017 12:42:49 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This article reads like so much crap, I can almost hear the melodramatic music keying in the background. oh, fear! Oh, gloom and doom!


13 posted on 11/03/2017 12:47:07 PM PDT by Ciexyz (I'm conservative & traditionalist, a Nationalist and a patriot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I didn’t know Seth Rich was Russian.


14 posted on 11/03/2017 12:47:19 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I skimmed the story quickly and determined that it is completely phony.

For one thing, they describe the Clinton campaign's digital security measures as "top-of-the-line." That itself is a joke.

Then they claim that some Russian operative claimed that he had 'thousands of emails' worth of dirt on Clinton, without any documented connection to the DNC or the Clinton campaign.

Lastly (and related to the previous point), they completely ignore the possibility that the "thousands" of emails about Clinton were actually hacked from her illegal unsecured home server, not the computer network of her campaign or the DNC.

15 posted on 11/03/2017 12:49:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It wasn’t a hack, it was a leak and his name was Seth Rich.
He was plugged.


16 posted on 11/03/2017 12:53:31 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
PAGING JULIAN ASSANGE!

I believe Assange when he said the Russians DIDN'T DO IT. And Assange knows more about Seth Rich's murder than he is willing to admit.

18 posted on 11/03/2017 12:55:22 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This has to be one of the stupidest, most dishonest articles about the DNC and Clinton leaks.

From the article:

“The AP’s reconstruction— based on a database of 19,000 malicious links recently shared by cybersecurity firm Secureworks — shows how the hackers worked their way around the Clinton campaign’s top-of-the-line digital security to steal chairman John Podesta’s emails in March 2016.”

Podesta’s password was password.

Supposedly everyone in the office had it because Podesta would forget and he needed help to log on.

The article contains no evidence whatsoever. No sources for information. It just repeats what Democrat staffers said.

The FBI and the “intelligence community” never had access to the computers in question.

Never.

So when the story cites the FBI and “intelligence community” they are being dishonest.


20 posted on 11/03/2017 12:58:48 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hey if people are stupid enough to believe this crap run with it.


21 posted on 11/03/2017 1:00:29 PM PDT by McGruff (Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

” It was just before noon in Moscow on March 10, 2016, when the first volley of malicious messages hit the Hillary Clinton campaign.”

Ahhh... the CIA’s “Umbrage” program as described in vault 7 of Wikileaks. Collect tools from hackers worldwide. Add a few Cyrillic letters in the program. Launch cyber attacks during normal business hours of the country you want to blame.

IE... “It was just before noon in Moscow on March 10, 2016, when the first volley...”

This is just a modern Gulf of Tonkin, a modern USS Maine, a modern Belgian babies, a modern Kuwaiti babies thrown from incubators. Total BS.


22 posted on 11/03/2017 1:02:05 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Fantasy news reporting, and that’s being kind.

The info from Podesta and the DNC was leaked by WikiLeaks. Nobody is denying this. However the process that the information was obtained and released to WikiLeaks is in dispute. There is no ‘Political Damage’ to someone, or even a government obtaining the emails. No, it is clearly the release of said emails that had a political impact.

What I am trying to say is, the emails may have been obtained from multiple times, but the time that really matters politically is the one that lead to the WikiLeaks release. The Russians, the North Koreans, the Iranians, private Hackers, CIA using software to look like the Russians could have penetrated to the information. So, looking like the Russians means absolutely NOTHING, because it’s potentially an electronic cover your tracts anyway. Even then, so what if it was the Russians if they didn’t disseminate the information.

The key here is who gathered the Information and then gave it to WikiLeaks. That has already partially been settled. The time stamps on the download prove it wasn’t an ‘internet’ download or a remote hack (like the Russians). Too fast for internet, so it was downloaded locally. That means at the server or computer directly linked to it. So the individuals WERE there in the building. That entirely kills the false narrative of this article, demonstrates it as a attempt to confuse people, and deceive them from the reality. FAKE NEWS, or they need to say that they believe the Russians hackers were in the building doing this.

So, what we got here is an inside job. Inside the building. Further, not a single ‘stolen’ document has a date after the death of Seth Rich. What the author describes here is liberal fantasy, the Russians did it, because all evidence points to a DNC insider, who was unable to download at the server, anymore information nearly the same time as the death of Seth Rich.

Finally, with the current information that the Russians only want conflict and chaos, disclosing this information gives them a motive. The Russians supporting Hillary stuff after the election proves that they were interested in discord, not a Trump victory, and the emails provided that. However, based upon statements, Seth Rich was motivated by justice and a Jesuit moral code. Further, Seth was a Bernie supporter. Armed with this information, all parties above had motive to expose the DNC and Podesta, but the Russians would have included emails of Bernie and other parties on the server, while Seth Rich would not have.

24 posted on 11/03/2017 1:12:41 PM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson