Skip to comments.How About Targeting the Demographic Most Likely to Wage Jihad?
Posted on 11/03/2017 4:35:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
A Muslim immigrant stands accused of waging jihad in New York City. He is accused of spilling innocent blood on American soil in the name of Allah in the name of the religion of peace.
To be clear I am not anti-Muslim. I am just anti-getting plowed over by a rented pickup truck on a bike path.
If you believe the Democrats and the Mainstream Media, this attack had nothing to do with the suspects religious beliefs. But in reality the attack had everything to do with his beliefs.
Thats why this heinous monster shouted Allahu Akbar as he took out as many of the infidels as he could.
Instead of action, our government has given us platitudes and hollow statements of defiance.
Our spirit will not be broken.
This is the new normal.
We will get through this.
The terrorists will not win.
Well, the fact of the matter is - the terrorists are winning. And thats in large part because of politically correct lawmakers and a flaccid immigration policy.
The suspect in Tuesday's New York City attack - came to our shores -- through a diversity visa program. He had no discernable skills he had done nothing to merit admission to the country.
In other words, our government was willing to sacrifice our safety for the sake of multiculturalism.
How about we start profiling the people most likely to blow us up and run us over? Or better yet -- why don't we stop them before they get into our country?
I shudder to imagine how many other Islamic radicals are lurking in the shadows -- waiting to drive a pickup truck into a crowd of innocents - waiting to shout Allahu akbar as they wage their bloody jihad.
How many more people must die in the name of the religion of peace?
What happened in New York City does not have to be the new normal. I reject such defeatist statements.
Whether we like it or not, we are at war with radical Islam. Whether or not we fight back well that is the million dollar question.
And I have no doubt President Trump will unleash the military so they can crush the Islamic radicals and dispatch them to the Lake of Fire.
Democrats and the Mainstream Media will fight us tooth and nail. They contend any effort to protect our nation from the Islamic radicals is a form of Islamophobia.
They seem to believe the moral high ground is to get blown up by the Islamic radicals. I say the moral high ground is to stop the radicals before they can wage jihad.
Americans have a choice - we can either be safe or we can politically correct. We cannot be both.
Well I am. I hate mudslimes.
The problem is the fanatics, which is why the screening procedure should be:
1- Pet a dog.
2- Drink an alcoholic beverage
3- Eat some bacon.
4- Draw a picture of Mohammed.
5- Tear a page out of the Koran and flush it down a toilet.
I saw NYC’s plan to combat terrorism on the news: They are installing cement “dragon’s teeth” all over that bike path. I knew Muslims had won when the mosques were still in business on 9/12/2001; it was confirmed when NYC started parking garbage truck barriers along parade routes to prevent vehicle attacks like this. Imagine living in a bunker with a couple of million people; Rockefeller Center should look good with concrete blocks on the ice to prevent Zamboni jihadists...
The problem is recognizing ISLAM as a religion. It is a world system, opposing every facet of the U.S. Constitution. ISLAM has been at odds with America since our nation’s inception. We’d do well to revisit American History to realize ISLAM and FREEDOM cannot coexist.
WILLIAM FEDERER’S “Islamic Conquest-Past & Present” should be in every family library.
1) Mohammed’s military career, Islam’s conquests & the Renaissance.
2) Islamic Expansion, the Crusades & Tamerlane
3) Fall of Constantinople & Columbus’ Voyage
4) Muslim Pirates, Martin Luther, John Smith & the Pilgrims
5) Is the United States becoming a Dhimmi nation?
Because what you propose would be an efficient use of limited government resources. The idiot PC libtards want inefficiencies and excuses to grow government and power/control.
Musselmen - a term hated by all musselmen ...
Much of modern liberalism is based on ignoring the obvious
Yet he calls for action to stop Muslims from doing what Muslims do. That by definition is anti-Muslim. He makes no sense.
It is sensible to be anti-Muslim in thought and deed.
There were many Nazis in Germany during WWII that would never hurt anyone. They believed in the national socialist system, but were not violent. Did they get a pass? Was it morally wrong to be anti-Nazi? Did anyone preface an article with “Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti-Nazi”?
What a silly, politically correct statement.
The writer may as we have said, "To be clear - I am not anti-Nazi. I am just anti-getting dragged off to Bergen-Belsen simply because I am a Jew." His flaccid PC logic is the same.
Why are people so afraid of calling a spade a spade? The murder cult of Islam itself is the problem not getting "plowed over"!
Close, but everyday islam is at war with the West; we should respond in kind.
Congress should grant President Trump war-making powers to deal with islam within the US.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.