>>What the hell is feminist science???
The psychotic delusion that if we all just dance in unison - Molok won't eat us... again?
I’ll fly on the plane designed in accordance with old white male physics and engineering principles, thank you.
“who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor”
One must leave science to become a women’s studies professor.
Short answer, she couldn’t cut it in neuroscience.
Furthered, of course, by Muslim scholars. Just ask NASA.
She’s a beaut!!
I’d tell her ..... you need to grow a pair.....put she might hurt her self straining....trying to do just that.
If a woman is in a forest and a tree falls, does her hearing register something different, because she’s a woman, than what a man would hear? /sarc
Why is this person even allowed to teach?
Universities need to be starved of money, until crap like this is cleared out.
>>What the hell is feminist science???
The psychotic delusion that if we all just dance in unison - Molok won't eat us... again?
To a hater, everything is hate. Not news.
Further, she concludes by expressing hope that people will soon come to “embrace an irreverent disdain for traditional science and instead practice feminist science,” adding that this is time for a “much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”
So science should equal untruth, as well as be anti-science ...?
I just don't know what to say. I can't come up with anything sarcastic or outrageous in reply ... the assertion itself is just so staggeringly stupid that I have no comeback.
This is yet another round-about way to erase the history of the white man.
The ‘feminist’ version of science will not alter scientific fact, but first demonize the likes of Newton, Galileo, et al, as wife beaters who stole the information from women and girls and made it their own. The ‘patriarchy’ went along with it because, well, they’re the patriarchy.
An example of marginalizing/erasing the ‘man’ out of history, ask your phone app who was the first man on the moon. They answer “the first human to set foot...”. Then ask it who was the first woman in space. The answer: “The first woman in space...”.
Incrementalism. Works every time.
“who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor at UC-DavIs”
Let me guess. Guessing she didn’t have the mental horse power for a real degree.
Does that include Climate Science?
If you don't get called a racist at least once every couple of weeks, or do something identified by the left as racist every day or two... You're probably not trying or maybe you're on vacation. Then again, I'm sure there's some lefty loon out there who will identify vacationing as wildly racist. I mean, how dare you take a break from supporting illegals and the welfare state! You must hate them you racist bast....
What this person is suggesting, this “much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”, rings very similar to Stalinist-era Soviet politically correct "science" or the Margaret Sanger - Nazi school of genetics. It has nothing to do with truth. It has everything to do with justifying a person's choices and behaviors.
1
Militant ignorance.
Bet the professor wants to redefine biological science.
An alpha particle doesn’t care about anyone’s race.
Gravity is racist, math is racist, physics is racist. Yea, that’s the ticket.
Now that must be some fun reading!