Further, she concludes by expressing hope that people will soon come to “embrace an irreverent disdain for traditional science and instead practice feminist science,” adding that this is time for a “much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”
So science should equal untruth, as well as be anti-science ...?
I just don't know what to say. I can't come up with anything sarcastic or outrageous in reply ... the assertion itself is just so staggeringly stupid that I have no comeback.
“We need to disrupt the epistemic authority of Science…[and] the assumption that science = truth,” Giordano writes, further arguing that this can be done by implementing a “feminist science practice that explicitly unsticks Science from Truth.”
How does “climate change” fit into this? I thought the “science” was settled.