This looks like careful and competent police work. It was certainly a suspicious ad that led to their investigation of his emails, which then led to his arrest.
Can’t find any fault based on what’s in the article.
I am nervous about the wording of the charge-Receiving child porn. If receiving is a crime, especially with email then anyone can be sent an email then busted for it. Soliciting porn would be a different thing and understandable actionable.
“This looks like careful and competent police work.”
Now, if law enforcement in jurisdictions of Podestas, Clintons, et al., would take a clue from these police. With all the evidence out there, why is nothing being done?
Looks like a pretty weak case to me. So far at least.