Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roy Moore has 11-point edge over Doug Jones in new Senate race poll
WBRZ Fox 6 ^ | 10/18/17 | Rick Journey

Posted on 10/19/2017 6:06:02 PM PDT by Redmen4ever

Republican Roy Moore leads Democrat Doug Jones by 11 percentage points in a new Raycom News Network Senate Election poll conducted by Strategy Research.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.wbrc.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: alabama; dougjones; jones; moore; roymoore; strange; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
3,000 Likely voters. Roy Moore [R] 51 to Doug Jones [D] 40.
1 posted on 10/19/2017 6:06:02 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

This poll appears to have changed drastically in the last two days. First, the two were tied, now Moore is ahead.
Didn’t look closer, but it does confirm that our doubt in pollsters is not without justification.

(Although I’m very very glad that Moore is ahead - if he indeed is.)


2 posted on 10/19/2017 6:09:06 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

Polls. Three days ago FOX aired one that had Moore 8 points behind. That’s a 19-point spread. Polls... secret sauce (adjusting for prior turnout)... pollsters.

Go, Roy.


3 posted on 10/19/2017 6:09:19 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

I’m looking forward to seeing how much money McConnell will spend in this race. If the primary is worth $10 million to him you think he would spend a similar amount in the general against a DEMOCRAT. Right?


4 posted on 10/19/2017 6:09:40 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The D/R/I sampling in the Fox poll was a joke.


5 posted on 10/19/2017 6:12:18 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

Can’t be. I just read that the Republican majority is in danger because we picked far right wacko candidates in the primaries.

Do I really need a sarc/???


6 posted on 10/19/2017 6:12:40 PM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom not more government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

The sampling usually is a joke.

It’s usually transparently motivated. More importantly, it uses past performance adjustments to compensate for having too small a sample. If you blindly sampled ten times as many people, the party selection bias would be markedly reduced.


7 posted on 10/19/2017 6:13:51 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
If the primary is worth $10 million to him you think he would spend a similar amount in the general against a DEMOCRAT.

It wouldn't surprise me if he spent $10 million.

It would surprise me if he spent it AGAINST the democrat.

8 posted on 10/19/2017 6:16:20 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Fox had a poll that had him 8 points behind? Can you provide a link to that?


9 posted on 10/19/2017 6:18:50 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

No, he was ahead all along.

The other poll was a anomaly or just a flat out fraud.

He was ten ahead about 10 days ago, and I knew yesterday’s was for effect.

I said as much, and this seems to confirm it.

I wasn’t the only one saying so.


10 posted on 10/19/2017 6:19:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Waste of money on a failing effort...would have been much better suited for October 2018. $10 million is not chump change - imagine if that was spent, for example, in Michigan against Debbie Stabenow instead of in an intra-party battle.


11 posted on 10/19/2017 6:20:37 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote; fieldmarshaldj

This is a different polling outfit.

The Fox poll showing a tie was dog feces.


12 posted on 10/19/2017 6:23:39 PM PDT by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

No, I can’t provide a link. But, pretty I’m sure I saw it announced last week.

Now, I did a quick internet check before replying, and there’s a more recent poll which has it tied at 42-42 as of a couple of days ago. Sorry.


13 posted on 10/19/2017 6:25:33 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Facebook seems to be populated by middle aged folks-———the kids are rarely there now.

.


14 posted on 10/19/2017 6:27:28 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Three days ago, eh?

Meanwhile, Shemp Smith was crowing that a new Fox News poll today had Moore and Jones neck and neck. Figured that one is fishy.


15 posted on 10/19/2017 6:37:46 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

What ive discovered about polls is.....
If the republican is leading by 1..they win by 10...
If the democrat is leading by 1..they win by 1...with a 123% turnout...


16 posted on 10/19/2017 6:42:29 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The Fox poll showed a tie. But, it’s a Registered Voter poll. This being an off-year, special election, that poll is probably off by a lot. Taking all the polls into account, the new one, and the four in the RealClear average, Judge Moore is ahead by 6 or 7 points. Let’s see what kind of money the Democrats throw into this race. I’d be happy is they spent $5 or 10 million, and we won by 1 vote.


17 posted on 10/19/2017 6:50:35 PM PDT by Redmen4ever (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Push polls in Alabama who show this close are delusional. The Republican senate funds spent 4-5 million trying to get Strange the nomination and then left Moore on his own when they lost their “man”. Anyone send a few bucks to Moore if you can. No money = close. We need to low this out of the water.

No way will Alabama vote a democrats into statewide office. Demo = pro gay, pro abortion, anti second, anti free speech, anti personal freedom, anti Christian. It will never happen. No how no way. Moore will be a US senator. Just a matter of how close.


18 posted on 10/19/2017 6:58:43 PM PDT by wgmalabama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The Fox poll was of 300 “register voters” while this one is of 1000 “likely voters”.....big difference! A friend of mine is high up in the state party and she says all polls done with likely voters show Moore winning handily....


19 posted on 10/19/2017 7:32:50 PM PDT by BamaDi ("The definition of a racist today is anyone who is winning an argument with a liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

I doubt the GOPe or the Democrats will throw much money at this election. GOPe hates Moore, but why waste money when they know he is going to win. Same for the Democrats.


20 posted on 10/19/2017 7:38:16 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson