Posted on 10/11/2017 4:45:35 PM PDT by madprof98
“The reports also shows that the charity failed to disclose the full compensation arrangement in its tax filings.”
And that is Moore’s problem, why?
The Washington Post faults Moore because he was the president of the charity. This makes him responsible for the IRS report from the charity.
In this case the National Review is pumping the WP story but aren’t the initial source of it.
Thank God for Trump. If not for his election, we would still be thinking that National Review was actually conservative, or that Rick Lowry was conservative, or Brett Stephens was conservative. Now we know better.
Stephens went to the Wall Street Journal and recently moved to the New York Times. Now he is a contributor to MSNBC. Can you believe it? Wherever the enemy to all things Republican is where he wants to hang. The man is a full-blown leftist now.
Talk about over representation. Of the 22 on that list, at least 12 of them are Bolsheviks (i.e. liberal Jews).
The house that Buckley built is on fire.
If you promise to pay me the $999,995 dollars when you can my salary is still only $5 until you pay it.
I think it’s the GOPe and their swamp master who came out strongly against Moore to make sure he isn’t electable. Seems like someone was a tad ticked that Alabama won’t bow the knee. #RollTide.
Anyone on Free Republic who still subscribes to NR should be permanently banned. Hit NR in the pocketbook by a mass cancellation of subscriptions.
Reading it on my flip phone smartass
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.