Posted on 10/11/2017 4:45:35 PM PDT by madprof98
According to a report from the Washington Post, Roy Moore, the Republican senatorial candidate from Alabama, collected a yearly salary of $180,000 from the Foundation for Moral Law. The reports also shows that the charity failed to disclose the full compensation arrangement in its tax filings. It’s a bad story for Moore, whose judiciousness was already in question.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Conservative?
No way.
Their latest issue claims speech is ‘violence’.
And they impugn Pres. Trump AGAIN.
Is it the foundation’s problem AND Moore’s problem? I couldn’t finish reading the article because of all the interference from the irritating ads.
The question is what did Moore report?
Moore doesn’t control what they reported.
>> the charity failed to disclose the full compensation arrangement
No doubt Moore declared the income. And if the charity neglected to indicated the expense, the IRS may gain on the charity’s incorrect retained earnings.
Seems like a BS story.
In the olden days, a scandal like this might have derailed a campaign. When you look at the skullduggery on the other side in these contemporary times, anything less than murder, treason, or rape/groping looks pretty good.
Go Moore!
Expletive deleted Democrats!
The National Review is the handmaids of the .001 %
We are not in a political campaign, we are in a war for the future of our country.
Roy Moore has been on the front lines of that war for over 20 years.
He is on the right side and he is too old to serve enough terms to become as corrupt as the people he is replacing.
That’s good enough for now.
I think they would prefer a Democrat victory. This story is not new, it was used in the primary by McConnell’s money machine and his pet candidate, Luther Strange.
They want the Dems in so there hands will be clean in Imperial
If you aren’t reading it on a phone there really is no excuse for your complaining about ‘irritating ads’.
I’m sure you’ve been told countless times to install free Ad Blocker, which then brings up the article with zero ads, irritates National Revue instead of you, so keep your complaints to yourself.
Why am I not surprised that the NeoCons are hostile to Christians.
Here is a Theodore Kupfer defending a liberal and establishing credentials by throwing the anti-semite label. https://nlonthedl.wordpress.com/2015/10/08/dershowitz-petition-lacks-validity/
>>>>No doubt Moore declared the income.
That could be the $180,000 question. Has he released his tax returns?
Theodore Kupfer is a National Review Institute William F. Buckley Fellow in Political Journalism. He graduated from the Johns Hopkins University and hails from central Pennsylvania.
Another Rino in the wings.
Oh, the National Review! Well, in THAT case.....yawn...snore...they’re all about touting establishment Rinos like Luther Strange. It probably pains them to be in the same class as Trump, since he backed Strange, but they’ll hold their nose and do it, if it means they can try to de-legitimize Moore, who actually IS a conservative. It does have a number true conservatives, but so many of them are rabid NeverTrumpers, as to cause them to row for the other side, to avoid even the hint of affiliation with PTrump. They also have a good number of establishment Rinos. Frankly, if they’d just admit they were wrong about Trump, and embrace him, almost all would be forgiven. But most of them won’t, because the election spanking they got was too embarrassing, and they’d rather let the bad guys win, than give in to Trumpism. Silly prideful adults, behaving like children.
This is insane. I don't have the cash and you don't have the cash, but it's reportable compensation?? What, so the IRS can get their cut on money no one has?
“According to a report from the Washington Post...”
All you need to know! Fake News!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.