Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Las Vegas Shooter's Life Comes Into Focus, But Not His Motive
NPR ^ | October 6, 2017 12:02 AM ET | Howard Berkes

Posted on 10/06/2017 7:25:31 AM PDT by Zhang Fei

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Jeff Chandler
The lack of reported motive is the dog that doesn’t bark. I suspect they know his motive but aren’t saying.

Ding.. Ding.. Ding!

Give Mr. Chandler TEN boxes of our BEST CUBAN CIGARS.

61 posted on 10/06/2017 12:53:01 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gahanna Bob; lgjhn23

If Trump knows, then why isn’t he telling us?


62 posted on 10/06/2017 5:21:01 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: generally

“...If Trump knows, then why isn’t he telling us?...”

I suspect that he will eventually.
It’s probably pretty bad, and they’re afraid of the public outrage that would ensue if it were known.


63 posted on 10/06/2017 6:34:01 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Exactly, how did this Marine come to that conclusion when his own family and current neighbors do not know Paddocks views?
And clearly he was wrong about Paddock’s interest in guns.


64 posted on 10/06/2017 10:47:52 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rx

what interview and where was it?
how did this so-called marine know anything about Paddock and whether he was pro Trump. You’re a troll if you post this trying to make it seem credible.
What seven months did he live next to Paddock and why is it his family and other neighbors have no clue his politics just this one guy who said he was only a neighbor for 7 months?

Guess he was correct on the fact Paddock showed no interest in guns too. eyeroll


65 posted on 10/06/2017 10:51:46 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: archy

How so? Can you elaborate? (Your meaning seems ambiguous)


66 posted on 10/07/2017 1:40:56 AM PDT by Concentrate (ex-texan was right and Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. Podesta the molest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
Ah, gotta love your effortless ability to question and dismiss eye-witnesses with your eye roll. --NOT!

Your verbal/written behavior here should give all of us pause as to just what your agenda is (anytime you post)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ5AyqwHqQQ

67 posted on 10/09/2017 1:00:35 PM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson