Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court takes up case that will devastate public sector unions
thinkprogress.org ^ | Sep. 28, 2017 | IAN MILLHISER

Posted on 09/28/2017 1:29:39 PM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: PROCON

The source is a pro-union source.

“The plaintiff in Janus asks the Supreme Court to declare these agency fees unconstitutional, at least in contracts involving public sector unions, under what can charitably be described as an aggressive reading of the First Amendment.”

I’m not familiar with this case. But I can imagine Republican workers contributing their time (evenings and weekends) to a Republican candidate, only to see their money (forced union dues) going to the opposing Democratic candidate. I think the Beck (1988 Supreme Court decision) addressed that, but was never enforced.


21 posted on 09/28/2017 1:51:53 PM PDT by ChessExpert (NAFTA - Not A Free Trade Agreement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women. Ok, I get it.


22 posted on 09/28/2017 1:53:40 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71


23 posted on 09/28/2017 1:54:55 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Even that Commie Franklin Delano Roosevelt opposed public sector unions.


24 posted on 09/28/2017 1:55:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why do unions need funds to negotiate contracts?


25 posted on 09/28/2017 2:07:03 PM PDT by bagster (Recuse me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
The flaw in the logic of the article is assuming that the union contract actually benefits the workers who don't belong. For example, seniority-based pay and retention/layoff systems may benefit some employees, but are generally a disadvantage to more capable employees who happen to be younger. Better workers also might prefer a disciplinary system that makes it easier to determine poor workers, yet the union will always push to make discipline as difficult as possible. Workers should not have to pay a government union that works against their individual interests
26 posted on 09/28/2017 2:08:07 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; All
"The case presents an issue that was recently before the Court, and where the justices split 4-4 along party lines [emphasis added]."

The states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect unions regardless what union bullies probably want low-information members to think.

So if all Supreme Court justices respected the 10th Amendment, which they take an oath to do when they swear to protect and defend the Constitution, then we’d probably be seeing more relevant Supreme Court cases concerning unions and everything else decided unanimously in the states’ favor.

And if we had a Congress that actually respected state sovereignty then we’d have a state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court sooner than “we” might think.

So patriots need to pink-slip as many incumbent members of Congress as they can in the 2018 elections, replacing them with state sovereignty-respecting patriots who will support Trump’s vision for MAGA.

In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of state sovereignty-respecting patriots on the primary ballots.

27 posted on 09/28/2017 2:16:28 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
LOL, I'm going to venture a guess and assume your anti-union?

Bad memories?

28 posted on 09/28/2017 2:44:30 PM PDT by PROCON (#MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

You are on the right track.

It is a leftist myth that all workers have common interests.

That myth does not survive contact with the real world.


29 posted on 09/28/2017 2:59:30 PM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

A long story, but let’s just say free-market economists and college teacher unions don’t mix. After $50K in legal bills and a fun 2 years leading to a favorable Arbitration when I politely refused to the Union — I did get my position back.
I can laugh now, but at the time it was unpleasant (and eye-opening) to say the least. They really are a bunch of collectivist jerks - stupid, too....


30 posted on 09/28/2017 3:09:06 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jonno

We need a go fund me page to raise enough money to buy him.


31 posted on 09/28/2017 3:31:45 PM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
a case seeking to defund public sector unions

I sure hope so.

32 posted on 09/28/2017 3:33:58 PM PDT by libertylover (We EXPECT RESPECT for the flag and anthem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
and make the commie bastards collect their own dues too!
33 posted on 09/28/2017 4:26:33 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

Roberts, our Mclame on the Supreme Court.


34 posted on 09/28/2017 5:28:55 PM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Supreme Court takes up case that will devastate public sector unions

GOOD!

The union-thug bureaucRATs always "collectively bargain" against the taxpayers....who never have a seat at the table.

35 posted on 09/28/2017 6:07:30 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Awesome. The feds, in particular, need to disbanded...


36 posted on 09/28/2017 6:09:13 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The case that needs to be brought is that no union can contribute to a politician who can vote, approve or negotiate their pay or benefits or working conditions. That’s where the conflict of interest is.


37 posted on 09/28/2017 6:10:28 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Imprison Obama, Clintons, Holder, lynch now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Elizabeth Warren (Fauxahontas) has intorduced a bill in Congress that would BAN RIGHT TO WORK states.

That has to die & quickly.


38 posted on 09/29/2017 5:18:07 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson