Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court takes up case that will devastate public sector unions
thinkprogress.org ^ | Sep. 28, 2017 | IAN MILLHISER

Posted on 09/28/2017 1:29:39 PM PDT by PROCON

In what is all but certain to be a terrible blow to organized labor, the Supreme Court announced on Thursday that it will hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case seeking to defund public sector unions. The case presents an issue that was recently before the Court, and where the justices split 4-4 along party lines.

Now that Neil Gorsuch occupies the seat that Senate Republicans held open for more than a year until Donald Trump could fill it, he holds the fifth vote to deliver a staggering blow to the union movement.

The issue in Janus involves what are sometimes referred to as “agency fees” or “fair share fees.” As ThinkProgress explained when this issue was last before the Court:

Unions are required by law to bargain on behalf of every worker in a unionized shop, even if those workers opt not to join the union. As such, non-members receive the same higher wages (one study found that workers in unionized shops enjoy a wage premium of nearly 12 percent) and benefits enjoyed by their coworkers who belong to the union.

Absent something else, this arrangement would create a free-rider problem, because individual workers have little incentive to join the union if they know they will get all the benefits of unionizing regardless of whether they reimburse the union for its costs. Eventually, unions risk becoming starved for funds and collapsing, causing the workers once represented by a union to lose the benefits of collective bargaining.

(Excerpt) Read more at thinkprogress.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afscme; janusvafscme; publicsectorunions; scotus; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
I'm pleasantly surprised that SCOTUS opted to rehear this important case.

The corrupt unions are the democrats most loyal donors.

Next I'd like to see mandatory union membership, (as required in many states), be overturned.

1 posted on 09/28/2017 1:29:39 PM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON

As long as Kennedy doesn’t switch sides...


2 posted on 09/28/2017 1:33:45 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“they will get all the benefits of unionizing regardless of whether they reimburse the union for its costs.”

By “all the benefits” does this union mouthpiece mean like spending millions of dollars of union dues on campaigns of far left politicians? Or paying thugs from union dues to beat up or harass nonmembers or employers?

ThinkProgress = ThinkHardCoreLeftists.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 1:36:31 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

We’re linking to “Think Progress” now? But yes, this is huge. This sound exactly like the kind of stuff we hire Gorsuch to rule on.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 1:37:00 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
...Supreme Court takes up case that will devastate public sector unions...

Well, we can hope.

5 posted on 09/28/2017 1:37:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
It's obvious with the first sentence, ..certain to be a terrible blow to organized labor.. that this is bad news to the author, but the article remains good news for conservatives.

I despise unions.

6 posted on 09/28/2017 1:39:56 PM PDT by PROCON (#MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jonno

“As long as Kennedy doesn’t switch sides...”

It’s not Kennedy we have to worry about. Time to remind Roberts that the left owns him and will destroy him with whatever it is they have on him.


7 posted on 09/28/2017 1:41:42 PM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Beer! Because you can't drink bacon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

When they’re, (the left) losing, then yes, the link shows their fear, and our celebration.


8 posted on 09/28/2017 1:41:59 PM PDT by PROCON (#MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

9 posted on 09/28/2017 1:43:09 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Payback’s a bitch, ain’t it?

rwood


10 posted on 09/28/2017 1:44:05 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Public sector unions should be illegal...it creates an inherent conflict of interest (government gives union what it wants in return for support and contributions at election time). In Virginia the NEA is a ‘professional association’ and has no collective bargaining rights. As a professional association they can still make political contributions...they cannot reach into the public till and they cannot force teachers to join. (Private sector unions are arguably different in that they have a theoretical ‘arms length’ relationship with private sector employers and can not directly steal money from taxpayers.)


11 posted on 09/28/2017 1:45:41 PM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

12 posted on 09/28/2017 1:46:38 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Time for unions to go the way of the defined benefit plan - almost gone.


13 posted on 09/28/2017 1:46:49 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

14 posted on 09/28/2017 1:47:26 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Government employees should never have been allowed to be formed whereas, taxpayers are the ones who are held hostage to cover the expense which in turn the dims use against the people.


15 posted on 09/28/2017 1:47:30 PM PDT by grcuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogcaller

16 posted on 09/28/2017 1:48:28 PM PDT by 4Liberty (MSM = Democrat's PR firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Stop, you’re killing me here, LOL!


17 posted on 09/28/2017 1:48:44 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Public section unions should be completely illegal.
Serving in USGov needs to be service to USians, not their own pocket books. Those who don’t want to serve, can get a real job, outside of USGov, which can be unionized.


18 posted on 09/28/2017 1:48:49 PM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I belonged to a law enforcement union. They took out the dues every two weeks whether I was a member or not. Out of protest, I resigned from the union, only to find out that my vision care and dental plans were tied to the union contract. With two teen sons, I had no choice but to sign back up. The union never did a damn thing for me. Anything I ever won from any grievance I had, I did it on my own, without any representation from them. They were worthless then, and they’re probably still worthless now to the officers who are still working. When I retired in 2003, they tried to get me to join the Retiree’s Association. Screw them.


19 posted on 09/28/2017 1:49:21 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

Sure is.


20 posted on 09/28/2017 1:49:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson