I also have heard that the pill is behind the increase in breast cancer among women...
Anyway, the author suggests that potential negative findings were omitted from the 'marketing' campaign for the magic pill. It's as if Fake News was a thing? LOL
Well, have any seen the marketing campaign for prepubescent children to get immunized against the Human Papillomavirus (HPV)? -- In the marketing campaign they fail to mention the immunization only covers some strains and as such is not 100% effective. As well, they neglect to mention that HPV is transmitted via sexual activity and as such avoiding sexual activity is 100% effective preventing HPV.
In my opinion, when public and private health service providers sound more like pimps than unbiased experts, it implies they self-servingly push an agenda and or promote an ideology rather than serve the public interest. All information should be presented and people should be able to choose what to do themselves devoid of deceptive coercion by the wannabe elite powers that be....
Bump for later.
How do you explain Afghanistan?
So these homosexual Grandchildren are Genetically Modified b"rats."
Imagine that we pass laws to prevent off spring of mothers/grand & great-grand mothers based on government available records that are electronically available. I am sure the major drug corporations kept records of those who took their medications.
Now that we know the consequences, we can have a stealth program giving the GM (God) drugs to reverse the homosexuality with hormones.
This article is personally interesting as my youngest sister is a militant homosexual who was on hormone treatments in 7-12th grades. After marrying and having two children, her antisocial tendencies and a lousy husband worked to turn her into a sterotypical female homosexual - ugly to the point no man would touch her thus driven into the confort of others of her ilk. Sorry for the crud annology but this article strikes a chord.
just from the headline does homosexuality require birth control?
So, then, find a medical corrective. As it now stands, people outside the mainstream are so busy celebrating their diversity, they do not wish to find out if their condition was created by events that violated nature and could be ameliorated. There is even a lobby for deaf people who don't want to have their rights violated by having cochlear implants that could help them hear.
It always astounds me that when a male goes to a doctor convinced he is a female, he is given female hormones instead of male hormones.
Ping!
There were homosexuals long before the pill. And obviously many women took the pill when it came out which is borne out by the drastic drop in the birth rate at that time. There are not as many homosexuals as the left would like you to believe. So in comparison to the amount of women on the pill compared to the small number of homos, the numbers don’t pan out.
A witch who co-founded NOW just passed away last week.
Her sister was there at the founding and offered up this set of quotes:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
“When women go wrong men go right after them.” – Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish...
Kate Millett, Influential Feminist Writer, Is Dead at 82
NYT ^ | 9/6/2017 | EIL GENZLINGER
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3583835/posts
A) A lot of the animal testing is going to involve many times the clinical amount recommended in order to test for possible side effects.
B) People are supposed to avoid birth control pills if they might be pregnant.
C) We are all awash in various hormones as a byproduct of dairy and beef production.
Same sex attraction is the artificial, free response to trauma. Mommies who take the pill encourage the son’s ssa response to trauma. Healing the trauma removes the ssa.
Sadly, ssa is a binary response to trauma and seeks to join other people of ssa. It is a rule of zoology that small animals herd together for protection. Similarly, gays herd together for cowardly affirmation.
To me after 50 plus years of observing I think it’s nurtured and has predetermining factors
I’ve seen toddlers very feminine and sissified at say 18 months way before a choice or excessive nurturing
Pursing lips and twinkle toe posturing and feminine speech
DNA .....why do so many homosexual men look feminine and are pretty....or even handsome?
Nurturing ....why are so many queer men the product of coddling moms whom they have unhealthy relationships with
Is it causative or reactive ...chicken versus egg
Or Toyota Tundra driving buzz cut dykes....very physically masculine
I think it’s both nature and nurture
Not sure anyone wants to be a homosexual except dykes
Gay men seem to have lost the ability to see women sexually as objects of penetration and caress and prefer being penetrated themselves
All the queers I’ve known were sissies early....and pretty
The women were a little harder to figure early on
Rescue lesbos are all nurture
As maybe as molested boys who lose the ability to be penetrstors with sexual confidence preferring instead to be submissive twinks
I apologize
I probably lost people here
>> homosexuality is a choice
Does that include abused children?
Homosexuality is not the problem. It’s disregard, negligence, and condemnation of the natural heterosexual family that’s the problem. And any honest homo would admit to this.
We all know that once the family goes, so goes society. We need to focus on the family.
Homosexuals not unlike the poor will always be among us. And that’s not to say that are not without us.
Homosexualists keep pushing the “born that way” idea because, from a homosexual activist point of view, it is politically advantageous. However, if you do enough research into the psychology behind homosexuality, you realize that, for the vast majority of people afflicted with the condition, the theory is easily disproven.
Just like with “manmade global warming” they can put all the “evidence” in front of you and dress it up nicely so it looks convincing, but, unless you want to be a useful idiot, it is best to ignore the tainted mental feast and seek out your own facts.
Since faggots cannot replenish the herd they must indoctrinate
Without questioning the report in the YouTube link, or the other information the text gave, that would still leave a big question concerning homosexuals born from mothers before the age of pharmaceutical contraceptives. Would the same researchers then be looking for what else, in any “natural” way, would trigger the similar hormonal changes in the womb?
Additionally, it remains a premise, as regardless of the affects observed with the lab rats, no one has identified the “sexual behavior genes” to start with.
In the end, we are dealing with humans and not lab rats.
I think at most, even admitting the influences the report speaks of, would only provide, in my view, a “persuasion”, which the human can examine, and with or without help, learn how to handle, to channel interests away from it, from the earliest possible points in time on through puberty and maturity.
Why?
The entire new understanding of epigenetic influences - things that can cause genes to either be expressed instead of remaining dormant, or causing them to remain dormant (yes, we have thousands of genes that are responsive to epigenetic influences) also accepts that activities in nurture (life actions/activity/events when growing up) can also be involved. If those premises are true, then we must accept they can be influenced, or counter influenced by our thinking, our thinking about our actions.
Birth control chemicals are dangerous.