[llevrok]

so if this turns out to be cyberhacking (I have difficulty believing three or more crews all could be so piss poor at navigating), will the Navy say “ummmm....never mind!”

[JoSixChip]

so if this turns out to be cyberhacking (I have difficulty believing three or more crews all could be so piss poor at navigating), will the Navy say “ummmm....never mind!”

Have you ever been in the military? The military does not leave anything-up to a single system, especially for the big stuff like a ship. This was a failure of command. there should have been lookouts, radar and automated systems. Sure one system could be hacked, but not all at once. Someone was not doing their job.

[eartick]

so if this turns out to be cyberhacking (I have difficulty believing three or more crews all could be so piss poor at navigating), will the Navy say “ummmm....never mind!”

No because you will never hear that they found out the truth in the GPS shifting and radar hacking and secondly they would never ever admit they were wrong up in the crystal palace called the Pentagon.

[mad_as_he$$]

I will go on record right here and now. These collisions are not the result of hacking, GPS spoofing or even equipment failure. The investigations will conclude that this situation(multiple collisions) is a failure of human attention to the job and the detail(s) of the job.

The Navy has lost mission focus and needs to snap out of it. Unfortunately that will take time and cost more lives.

[Robert A Cook PE]

If it is cyber hacking, then HE is even more guilty of allowing that attack to succeed. But it isn’t . The crews are not performing because they’re doing hundreds of hours of social services lqbtq sexual awareness and environmental training that HE (the navy and Washington ) required.

[rlmorel]

"...so if this turns out to be cyberhacking..."

[Armscor38]

There are lookouts reporting to the bridge and they can’t be cyperhacked.