While we're at it, let's add this!
Posted on 08/21/2017 6:27:23 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
An exhibit alongside the nation's chief memorial to Thomas Jefferson will receive an update that reflects "the complexity" of his status as a founder of the United States and a slaveholder, according to stewards of the National Mall.
The decision reflects an acute awareness of the furor currently surrounding Confederate statues across the country. A non-profit group that provides critical support for the National Mall is bracing for similar protests against the Washington Monument and the Jefferson Memorial, although "there has been much broader support for maintaining them," as one official put it. But the Trust for the National Mall, which depends on private donors to fulfill its mission, is getting out in front of the uproar.
"In the coming weeks and months, the physical symbols of American history and democracy will be scrutinized and challenged," Catherine Townsend, president of the Trust for the National Mall, wrote in a letter to supporters. "When that happens, we will work with our partners to ensure the National Mall continues to be a vibrant and relevant place where Americans can learn about our history and imagine our future, together."
In practice, that means that visitors to "America's Front Yard" will see the Founding Fathers honored, but there will be a new emphasis on their personal records as slave-owners. The changes might first be apparent at the Jefferson Memorial; the Trust, even before the renewed debate over Confederate statues, has been planning to raise money to refurbish the National Park Service exhibit accompanying the memorial, which has deteriorated since its installment about 20 years ago.
"We can reflect the momentous contributions of someone like Thomas Jefferson, but also consider carefully the complexity of who he was," an official with the Trust told the Washington Examiner. "And that's not reflected right now in the exhibits."
The Trust has the ability to wield significant influence over the new exhibits, because they provide crucial private funding for the National Mall. The National Park Service faces an $11.49 billion deficit for repairing and maintaining the parks, including an $852 million shortfall for the Mall alone. The Trust works to fill that gap by coordinating fundraising drives from "patriotic philanthropists" and that support projects identified by the NPS as a top priority.
"The Park Service manages the site, and we'll always be clear on that -- but if we are a partner in help bringing private funding to make sure that they're able to update that exhibit, that's where we want to be thoughtful vis a vis what has happened, or, sort of, come to an inflection point in the last week," the official told the Washington Examiner. "That is where we'll be their partner in bringing together thought leaders and scholars to make sure that that content is really appropriate and thorough for what should be at that particular site."
Students of American history have long seen in Jefferson a two-toned image of the American founding. Most famously, he authored the Declaration of Independence. Confederate leaders faulted him for regarding slavery as an "evil" institution.
"The prevailing ideas entertained by [Jefferson] and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old [United States] constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically," Alexander Stephens, vice president of the Confederacy, said in his infamous "cornerstone" speech shortly before the outbreak of the Civil War. "It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time."
And yet, Jefferson owned slaves himself; he was criticized even within his lifetime for making a "concubine" of one of them, a woman named Sally Hemings. "[The Thomas Jefferson Foundation] and most historians believe that, years after his wife's death, Thomas Jefferson was the father of the six children of Sally Hemings mentioned in Jefferson's records, including Beverly, Harriet, Madison, and Eston Hemings," the foundation recalls.
That story might not receive a full airing on the Mall, even after the update. "There are somethings that are better represented and better explained at Monticello," the official said. "The Jefferson Memorial does not necessarily need to be an all-inclusive site and encapsulate all of that detail."
But the Trust will try to strike a balance between patriotic applause and the legacy of slavery, particularly as they initiate private fundraising drives at a time of rarely-intense criticism of the founders.
"Recent events only reinforce the need for an open, inclusive and safe space for Americans to exercise their First Amendment rights and to gather in pursuit of our shared ideals -- life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all," Townsend wrote in her message Thursday. "I hope you will join us as we steward private support to implement modern and resilient solutions that can transform this dynamic space and preserve the historic legacy of the National Mall. We want to hear from you, and we want to work with you."
“Recent events only reinforce the need for an open, inclusive and safe space for Americans to exercise their First Amendment rights and to gather in pursuit of our shared ideals”
“The Park Service manages the site, and we’ll always be clear on that — but if we are a partner in help bringing private funding to make sure that they’re able to update that exhibit, that’s where we want to be thoughtful vis a vis what has happened, or, sort of, come to an inflection point in the last week,” the official told the Washington Examiner.
“That is where we’ll be their partner in bringing together thought leaders and scholars to make sure that that content is really appropriate and thorough for what should be at that particular site.”
I eagerly await the MLK Jr memorial to update his position on homosexuality.
Will the “update” point out that slavery was outlawed in the US over 150 years ago?
Also, will the “update” note that it was Western culture which led the way in the abolition of slavery?
Why don’t they acknowledge it in the African American Museum built right next to Washington Monument? Seems like a great safe space and people with white guilt can go and confess their sins...
This is just asking for more trouble. Like wearing a sign on your back that says “Kick Me”
This is a NPS decision and Trump will allow it? I hope it is because he just does not know about it.
The problem was no education.
We've changed that also but so many blacks AND WHITES have not and refuse to take advantage of it.
Will a similar plaque be installed at the Martin Luther King Memorial, one that would list all of MLK’s personal shortcomings?
Side note: I really don’t care about MLK’s shortcomings, or Jefferson’s for that matter. Both were great men who were at the right place at the right time.
But the goal here is evidently to drive as many wedges between Americans as possible. Deliberate Balkanization. So why not install insulting plaques everywhere?
Of course, this will just make it a target.
Is the NPS that stupid or do they WANT it to be targeted?
.....and his womanizing.................
Let's not leave out adultery.
Let's not leave out his opposition to the Vietnam War.
How ‘bout Clinton’s shortcomings?
Lesson: No side got the issue of slavery right.
His plagiarism
While we're at it, let's add this!
Kindly Reminder: Barack Obama’s Family Owned Slaves
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/08/kindly-reminder-barack-obamas-family-owned-slaves/
> How ‘bout Clinton’s shortcomings? <
Oh, yes. But you wouldn’t need just one informational plaque to cover them all. You’d need dozens. Even liberal Wikipedia has noted that the Clinton Presidential Library glosses over (or ignores) Clinton’s many scandals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Presidential_Center#Controversies_and_criticism
Exactly. And I hope the “update” include detailed information about how African tribal rivalries over power and territory resulted in Africans putting fellow Africans into slavery.
Funny how one doesn’t hear antifa wanting to fight a war against the descendants of the Africans who were actively pushing to put their fellow Africans into chains.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.