Posted on 08/19/2017 4:24:42 PM PDT by Drango
Older smokers are usually more set in their ways, but a dollar increase in cigarette prices makes them 20 percent more likely to quit, a new Drexel University study found.
The study, published in Epidemiology, used 10 years of neighborhood-level price data to determine how it affected nearby smokers, focusing on those who skewed older.
“Older adult smokers have been smoking for a long time and tend to have lower rates of smoking cessation compared to younger populations, suggesting deeply entrenched behavior that is difficult to change,” said Stephanie Mayne, PhD, the lead author of the study who is a former doctoral student at Drexel and now a fellow at Northwestern. “Our finding that increases in cigarette prices were associated with quitting smoking in the older population suggests that cigarette taxes may be a particularly effective lever for behavior change.”
Taking a look at the local relationship between smoking habits and cigarette prices is an understudied but important area to look at, according to the senior author on the study, Amy Auchincloss, PhD, associate professor in the Dornsife School of Public Health.
“Results on this topic primarily have come from population surveillance,” she said. “But we had neighborhood tobacco price data and could link that to a cohort of individuals who were followed for about 10 years.”
Smoking cessation remains an important focus of public health efforts since it remains the largest preventable cause of death and disease in not just the United States, but the world.
The cohort Mayne and Auchincloss looked at included smokers ranging in age from 44 to 84 and stretched across six different places, including the Bronx, Chicago, and the county containing Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Data were taken from the study population between 2002 and 2012 as a part of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Artherosclerosis (MESA).
In addition to finding that current smokers were 20 percent more likely to quit smoking when pack prices went up by a dollar, Mayne and Auchincloss’ team showed that there was a 3 percent overall reduction in smoking risk.
However, when the data was narrowed to heavy smokers (defined as smoking more than half a pack a day), there was a 7 percent reduction in risk. When prices increased by a dollar, heavy smokers also showed a 35 percent reduction in the average number of cigarettes they smoked per day, compared to 19 percent less in the overall smoking population.
“Since heavy smokers smoke more cigarettes per day initially, they may feel the impact of a price increase to a greater degree and be more likely to cut back on the number of cigarettes they smoke on a daily basis,” Mayne said.
While the data focused on a population older than 44, Mayne believes the price effect may be “similar or possibly stronger in a younger population.”
“Some research suggests younger adults may be more price-sensitive than older adults,” she pointed out.
Something she found, though, was that smoking bans in bars and restaurants did not appear to have any effect on smoking behavior in the study population. Although more research is likely necessary to see why that is and whether it’s true — Mayne will soon publish a study devoted to that — one possible explanation is that the economic pressures of a cigarette price increase provide a stronger incentive to quit than placing limits on smoking in public places.
Mark Stehr, PhD, an associate professor in Drexel's School of Economics who also served as a co-author on the study, also had a thought on the bans' effect.
"A ban may be circumvented by going outside or staying home, whereas avoiding a price increase might take more effort," he pointed out.
Based on results from this study, raising cigarette prices appears to be a better strategy for encouraging smoking cessation across older ages.
“More consistent tax policy across the United States might help encourage more older adults to quit smoking,” Mayne said.
“Given our findings, if an additional one dollar was added to the U.S. tobacco tax, it could amount to upwards of one million fewer smokers,” Auchincloss said. “Short of federal taxes, raising state and local taxes and creating minimum price thresholds for tobacco should be essential components of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy - particularly in places with high tobacco prevalence.
Come on, now that Da Gummint is PARTNER$ w/ the tobacco industry, do they REALLY want them to quit..?
NO WAY..!!!
they do not want smokers to quit...quite the contrary, they want them to keep smoking and keep paying those taxes....its been a big payoff to the trial lawyers.....
I smoke a couple cigarettes some days, some days not-a pack last 2 weeks or so-I also like a glass of wine or a beer sometimes-these are things I enjoy, and I don’t care how much the cost, I will pay for things I enjoy LEGALLY as an adult, period. Nannys can’t stand for anyone to enjoy anything they don’t like-food, drink, smoke-next they’ll be telling us how many times a week we can have sex-someone needs to tell them to stfu and get a life...
I said i would never quit when a pack cost $3 per pack, then 4, then 5...after I decided to quit, I quit, with the help of God.
Econ 101.
Quit when they go up a $1? Hell I quit for good decades ago when they got up to a $1 a pack.
In 1980 I was a year out of high school and working in a convenience store. I can’t tell you the number of people who said to me, “When cigarettes hit $1 a pack I’m quitting”.
I doubt many did.
If the government can put price controls in place, they can manipulate the behavior of the sheeple.
Not news.
But, the traffic to the smoke shacks is never ending. And, most of the cars going there are beaters. That tells me that the people who are buying cigs are the least who can afford them.
Just my observation.
So if they cost $5 more smokers would be 100% more likely to quit?
A dollar each? Twenty dollars a pack?
I quit in early 2003.
Highest I ever paid for a carton was around $38 in 1999. They were around $18 per carton at a Native American tobacco store when I quit.
Over the years, I call the money I saved as my ‘mad money.’ When I think about a computer or laptop upgrade, etc., I take it from the ‘mad money.’ It would have gone up in smoke otherwise. I figure I have around $2500-3000 per year available.
I think current prices are around $6 per pack plus tax of $1.15 or around $280 per month.
why don’t they just make cigarettes with no nicotine? (and not those cocoa-shells ones either)
Each? I said > quit when they got to $1 a pack.
And the rise of the black market.
I was just going by the lead to the post. It didn’t state each or pack but on the street guys sell cigarettes by the each - they’re called “loosies” at a buck a piece.
I bought name brands Winstons, Marlboros, Camels in the 50’s for 25¢ pack or box, 2 bucks a carton. Everything is up or is it the dollar is down ?...if it’s killing you fails your attention...
Really, a buck for each? I,m going to buy cases of cartons, set up shop on the street, and sell them 3 for $2.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.