Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Time Has Come For Gridlock Reform
Townhall.com ^ | August 17, 2017 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 08/17/2017 7:49:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

When the Senate confirmed Judge David Nye to a federal district judgeship in Idaho, he became an acute illustration of what’s wrong in Washington right now.  Judge Nye was originally appointed by President Obama for the judgeship and enjoyed wide support from Senate Democrats, but when President Trump – in a good will gesture toward bipartisanship – re-nominated him those same Democrats delayed his confirmation for the maximum amount of time under Senate rules.

Now, why would they do that?

Senate Democrats have now become the doctors of gridlock. Forsaking the good will the minority party usually shows to the new party in power after a presidential election, the Democrats have also decided to prevent the President from actually filling important positions in the administration. This has the cumulative effect of preventing the public from getting action from the government it has elected to serve them.

This includes delaying (or outright blocking) exceedingly qualified individuals – such as Judge Nye and others – from filling well over 100 vacancies on the federal bench, threatening a backlog in the courts that could last for years.

President Trump was greeted with 105 judicial vacancies upon being sworn into office; more than four out of his five predecessors including twice as many as President Obama and three times as many as President Reagan. Even as Trump has nominated people to fill these vacancies, even more have opened up while the Democrats stifle the process.  The total has now ballooned to 138 judgeships that need to be filled.

The Democrats’ gridlock strategy is twofold: 1) demand a full 30 hours of debate on the Senate floor for each nominee.  At that rate Mr. Trump would need more than a full term as president to fill these seats on America’s courts, and 2) invoke a Senate “tradition” known as the blue-slip process. When a nominee is put referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, it has been tradition to wait until that nominee’s home state Senators pass a blue slip to the committee, effectively giving their blessing for the nomination to go forward.

The rationale for this strategy? The courts are the one place liberals are trying to control after losing Congress, the White House, a majority of governorships and state legislatures across the country. It’s purely political; if Americans have to wait endlessly for important legal disputes and questions to be settled, so be it.  They don’t care.

Republicans can provide a solution, a “gridlock reform” strategy to get these vacancies filled so the American people can bring cases before them and have their day in court without any further delay. First off, they can and should abandon the blue slip process as it has no legal standing and is being abused by one political party for political purposes to keep the government from working. Secondly, Republicans should adopt a proposal by Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.) that would cut the maximum hours of debate for nominations to eight hours or less.

The public has given the GOP an historic opportunity to steer our country back on track after eight years of partisan divide that accomplished precious little, leaving their faith in their government highly in question.  Senator Lankford’s ideas have merit and should be acted upon as soon as possible.  Republicans would be delivering a needed service to the American people and will undoubtedly be rewarded for it.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: senategridlock

1 posted on 08/17/2017 7:49:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

President Trump...get rid of the Obama RAT stooges. Make America great again.


2 posted on 08/17/2017 7:52:16 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A Constitutional Amendment that lets WE THE PEOPLE write the Senate’s rules. Not self-serving patronage weasels like Mitch McConnell.


3 posted on 08/17/2017 7:54:25 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

RINO, Deep State lover McConnell will never allow/push for the reasonable Langford proposed change.


4 posted on 08/17/2017 7:57:30 AM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t want any “gridlock reform.” A gridlocked government is a good thing for people who value their liberty.


5 posted on 08/17/2017 8:00:30 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
OK so Nye was nominated by Obama in April 2016 and the Senate sat on it for six months. He gets re-nominated in May and suddenly the Republicans are crying delay?

Republicans in the Senate will never change the rules because they worked for them in the past and they may need them again in the future.

6 posted on 08/17/2017 8:11:30 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sorry, Ken. We have “gridlock reform.” It’s called the GOP doing their freakin’ jobs as a majority and stop cowering like children.

Not one other thing is needed.


7 posted on 08/17/2017 8:14:55 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“A gridlocked government is a good thing for people who value their liberty.”

There’s nothing better than watching psychotic, adolescent, Progressive scu&bags losing their minds because the completion of their total subversion was thwarted, for now.

IMHO


8 posted on 08/17/2017 8:22:00 AM PDT by ripley (ually to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The goal of conservatives should ultimately be gridlock.


9 posted on 08/17/2017 8:35:42 AM PDT by WVMnteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hey Turtle,

Quick solutions to this problem are available. As I understand it, you, as Majority Leader (?), can change Senate rules any time you want.

GET TO WORK!!


10 posted on 08/17/2017 8:39:28 AM PDT by upchuck (Holding on to anger is like grabbing a hot coal to throw at someone. You are the one burned ~Buddah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The rationale for this strategy? The courts are the one place liberals are trying to control after losing Congress, the White House, a majority of governorships and state legislatures across the country. It’s purely political; if Americans have to wait endlessly for important legal disputes and questions to be settled, so be it. They don’t care.

Republicans can provide a solution,...

Too many Republicans are just as bad as the democrats and don't want Trump to succeed. Period. They'll do nothing to help him and Mitch McConnell is leading that parade.

11 posted on 08/17/2017 8:48:39 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bkmk


12 posted on 08/17/2017 9:27:01 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gridlock was built into the government by the Founders in a deliberate attempt to hamstring governing. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

If you don’t like gridlock, a better way to go is a parliamentary system such as in Canada and England.

In that system, the ministers in the majority form the government, usually with their leader, the prime minister, at it’s head. The conflict between the representative body and the executive is resolved inasmuch as the chief executive most often comes from the same party that put him at the top.

A sort of continuity is maintained by having the head of state function separated from the head of government. The head of state is the Queen or her representative, the governor-general.

The nice thing about parliamentary government is how quickly things can get done without all the gridlock. The bad thing is you might not like what’s being done. But we seldom like it, anyway.


13 posted on 08/17/2017 11:10:52 AM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson