Posted on 08/12/2017 8:48:05 AM PDT by Lorianne
Typical rich liberal, quick to solve problems with everyone else’s money.
Just taking from one person and giving to another is theft, pure and simple. Doing it ‘legally’ doesn’t make it morally or ethically ok. It just encourages people to not work, lowering productivity, resulting in too little wealth being generated to ‘take’ from. It is not sustainable, especially if there’s a population decline.
Facebook, Google, Amazon and other data collectors—I have a simple message.
Pay me.
A million dollars a month and we can call it even.
......I loathe Zuckerberg on many grounds. But, I try hard not to be a hypocrite ergo I am against FORCED taking of property VIA punitive income taxes from ANYBODY on ANY grounds! (except heirs)
Mr. Zuckerberg is headed toward the same place we all are and thus he will one day attone for his sins.
On “heirs”, I have a problem with worthless punks and punkettes being handed billions on grandpa’s death. I think that 95% of that excessive inherited money should never see a government account but he turned over to charities with a HISTORICALLY DEMONSTRATED 95% distribution record.
Yup, I deleted my Fakebook account a couple of weeks ago.
All they found out about me is I love my wife my dog and food but not in which order
But guess what they still have all your info
Yes, and the dirty little secret about poverty stats is they don’t count non-cash government benefits. So people get free or subsidized housing, food, education, utilities, and even phones and internet and none of that is counted as income! You could have every need met, and then some, paid for by taxpayers, have some cash income, get the un-earned tax credit and still be counted as living in poverty. It’s a giant scam. Ever watch the crime shows where the folks in the projects are driving new SUVs and sporting expensive shoes and fake nails?
This guy just OUTSOURCED 750 JOBS for monitoring content.
My answering machine plays the following message to all callers: "This number does not accept calls from telephone solicitors. If you are a telephone solicitor, please hang up now. If you are not a telephone solicitor, you may leave a message after the beep."
I don't answer the phone unless it's a number I recognize. I've considered buying a whistle and blowing it as loudly as possible as soon as the telephone solicitor identifies him/herself, but I don't know what kind of retaliation they might be able to enact.
Don’t bother with the whistle for the solicitors. It’s usually a recording.
They use our information to enrich themselves.
Every person who signs up for a Facebook account should be paid by Zuckerberg : )
You can bet the number of fake accounts would be cleaned up.
Exactly. He got and/or was greedy from DAY ONE. I doubt he started out with a detailed admin policy plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.