Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s first home-grown aircraft carrier could join the navy ahead of schedule
South China Morning Post ^ | 04 August, 2017 | Minnie Chan

Posted on 08/07/2017 8:01:10 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

China’s first home-grown aircraft carrier, the Type 001A, is likely to join the navy of the People’s Liberation Army by late next year, earlier than scheduled, analysts said.

The earlier-than-expected start to the carrier’s service marks a key acceleration of China’s effort to build up a blue-water navy to secure the country’s key maritime trade routes and to challenge the US’s dominant position in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in the South China Sea and the East China Sea.

China has one aircraft carrier in operation now - the Liaoning, which went into commission in 2012.

The 300-metre ship was refurbished from the unfinished Soviet carrier Varyag, which China bought from Ukraine in 1998. China’s first home-grown carrier, launched on April 26, and naval experts previously expected the ship would join the Chinese navy only by 2020.

However, two military sources told the South China Morning Post the navy had expected the Type 001A would be delivered to them as early as the end of 2018, or by 2019.

Hu Wenming, general manager of the Type 001A project, told China’s state television that the carrier’s propulsion system, namely the engine part, underwent tests, and the results were all good.

“Steam turbines of [the carrier] will all start to formally enter the mooring test phase, which will be ahead of our schedule in overall progress,” Hu said on state television on Thursday. The testing is a key and necessary step before the carrier is put into service.

Early pictures posted on the internet by military enthusiasts showed runway track lines were printed on the deck of the Type 001, while scaffolding outside the control tower was dismantled. These images hinted that equipment installation work on the carrier was almost completed - another sign that the carrier is close to being ready for service.

“Before we deliver the ship [to the navy], we also need to do a variety of systematic tests [at] sea, including matching tests of carrier-based aircraft, weapon systems and others,” Hu said.

Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie said the sea tests will cover electronic equipment, self-navigation, the radar system and the resilience of the propulsion system, as well as power network operation between different electronic and weapon system.

“The navy will also do a string of sea trials once it takes over the ship, which will also take several months,” Li said. “Normally, a carrier needs at least two years of different tests after its launch.”

Unlike its sister ship, the Liaoning, which was refitted based on the hull of a Russian carrier and uses the original Russian-designed propulsion system, the Type 001A is powered by eight home-made steam turbines with a displacement of up to 70,000 tonnes.

The Type 001A was produced by state-owned Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Offshore Company in Liaoning province, which also spent more than eight years to refurnish the Liaoning.

Based on the research and development experiences of the Liaoning, Hu said the design of the Type 001A will be more advanced than that of its sister ship. At the most intense period of ship building, Hu said more than 5,000 people from across the country were hired for the project. In addition, 532 state-owned or private scientific research units and their academics took part in producing ancillary facilities. More than 40 companies came from non-military sectors, reflecting Beijing’s push to integrate military and civilian development.

Li, the naval expert, said the 001A’s design would include technological breakthroughs in its missile and radar systems and hangar deck, reflecting the results of a decade of experience in rebuilding Liaoning.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china

1 posted on 08/07/2017 8:01:10 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, the PRC has to do something with all those trade surplus dollars.


2 posted on 08/07/2017 8:04:04 PM PDT by buckalfa (Slip sliding away towards senility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, lookie there, a future artificial reef.


3 posted on 08/07/2017 8:06:42 PM PDT by NCC-1701 ((You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

the pla navy obviously doesn’t read FR. otherwise, they would know that aircraft carriers are either massive wastes of money, at best, or 1,000 foot long coffins forced upon unsuspecting sailors by the treasonous navy brass, at worst.

silly chinese.


4 posted on 08/07/2017 8:08:29 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Home-grown? Not likely.


5 posted on 08/07/2017 9:45:56 PM PDT by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

“the pla navy obviously doesn’t read FR. otherwise, they would know that aircraft carriers are either massive wastes of money, at best, or 1,000 foot long coffins forced upon unsuspecting sailors by the treasonous navy brass, at worst.”

These Chinese aircraft carriers are a much worse waste of money than ours...

The Navy should accelerate the pace of getting the F-35C operational and deployed.


6 posted on 08/08/2017 4:45:00 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I hope they’ll come up with a better name than Type 001A. At least their other carrier was named after a province.


7 posted on 08/08/2017 9:37:17 AM PDT by bus man (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bus man
I hope they’ll come up with a better name than Type 001A. At least their other carrier was named after a province.

The British use a numeric designation for the classes of their ships: Type 21, Type 22, Type 23 for frigates, Type 42, Type 45 for destroyers, and so forth. But individual ships are named.

8 posted on 08/08/2017 9:57:19 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

I’s not how many they have now. It how many they are going to have and how fast they can crank them out. They have an industrial base,we don’t.


9 posted on 08/08/2017 9:59:04 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck; bus man

Type 001A is the shipyard designation. It is not technically part of the PLAN yet, so it will get a formal name only when commissioned. (It will reportedly be called the Shandong).


10 posted on 08/08/2017 10:09:24 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; big'ol_freeper; Impy; SevenofNine; Cletus.D.Yokel; Rummyfan; Liberty Valance; ...
Re: Type 001A is the shipyard designation. It is not technically part of the PLAN yet, so it will get a formal name only when commissioned. (It will reportedly be called the Shandong).

Rushing it in to service as it appears they are doing, they may need to name it the Dingdong.

11 posted on 08/08/2017 12:36:48 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
Rushing it in to service as it appears they are doing, they may need to name it the Dingdong.


12 posted on 08/08/2017 12:59:48 PM PDT by null and void (ObamaCare, giving the government the power of life and death over Americans since March 23, 2010...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

I’m sure they’ll work out the chinks


13 posted on 08/09/2017 4:24:26 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth. - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson