Thanks for including me in your ping/post. First let me say that while hg can be tough with his words, at least he’s a conservative. That puts him leagues ahead of 4z, who is an unreconstituted Obot—and not even one of the more rational ones, in point of fact.
Butter, I doubt anyone studied the frogmen pics any more closely than I did. Some of the stills did suggest frogmen, but only until they were explained. Each and every pic was explained to the point that I simply couldn’t believe in the frogmen. I know you do but in good faith I can’t.
I have no problem believing the engine was swapped. It’s been a while, but at some point I read evidence that persuaded me of that likelihood. Nothing has changed.
When it comes to Fuddy, all I can tell you is what I saw. I saw a pic of her floating dead in the water, still wearing her life jacket. It was a moment of horror for me. All I could think, as I stared, was, ‘Death’s Head.’ It gave me the willies. (Apologies to anyone related to Fuddy who might read this. It’s not perhaps sensitively worded, but it’s the truth.)
I reiterate what I said before. I know you are an honest Christian. If you say that you and your family were poisoned, I believe it. You have evidently uncovered some fact that wasn’t meant to be uncovered. I hope and pray that you and yours stay safe. As the Seth Rich case shows only too clearly, there is a great risk in exposing the deep state.
We can disagree over what was seen in the images. The clearer NTSB footage helps clear up some things and illuminates some other problematic things. Apparently Fuddy’s pants did bubble up as her legs churned. I haven’t had the time to look more closely to see if there is context that explains other things that I saw in the images so I can’t say for sure. The video was heavily edited so “context” is a relative term.
The audio evidence of no engine failure, the confirmation of military equipment on the wing and in the water (all of which had to be put there by SOMEBODY within minutes of the ditching), the proofs of the engine being changed out, etc... is all confirmed by people with much better experience, knowledge, and credentials than I have. I aimed to pass the baton to more capable hands and the Lord provided exactly what was needed so that could happen. In this context, my mistakes or confusion over what was in the video are irrelevant.
One of the “victims” (the same one who said the ground was “squishy” there) has acknowledged that one of the people right next to the plane in the video was not one of the people publicly known to have been on the plane. So even one of the witnesses there that day has acknowledged that there were extra people in the water while everybody was still next to the plane.
His comment was that we better have a good lawyer if we wanted to make anything of it. Strongly suggesting that very high-powered lawyers would be brought on to take us to the mat if we did anything actionable. Now who would have high-powered lawyers at their disposal, and why would they want to take us to the mat for simply affirming the acknowledged truth that there were extra people on-site IMMEDIATELY, before any rescuers arrived?
And why would those witnesses stand by and watch those who have noticed the truth be defamed and libeled, without correcting the record?
The life jacket you saw that had Fuddy floating dead in it - was it the fully-inflated adult life jacket that she had on in the video, or was it the partially-inflated infant jacket that the USCG pulled out of the water with “Fuddy” in it?
Thank you for believing my honesty and my Christianity. There can be honest disagreement over some things without assaulting the character of the other, but that certainly doesn’t serve the purposes of the Alinsky crowd.
The truth about HG will eventually be known. The roles of other freepers will also eventually be known.