Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

We can disagree over what was seen in the images. The clearer NTSB footage helps clear up some things and illuminates some other problematic things. Apparently Fuddy’s pants did bubble up as her legs churned. I haven’t had the time to look more closely to see if there is context that explains other things that I saw in the images so I can’t say for sure. The video was heavily edited so “context” is a relative term.

The audio evidence of no engine failure, the confirmation of military equipment on the wing and in the water (all of which had to be put there by SOMEBODY within minutes of the ditching), the proofs of the engine being changed out, etc... is all confirmed by people with much better experience, knowledge, and credentials than I have. I aimed to pass the baton to more capable hands and the Lord provided exactly what was needed so that could happen. In this context, my mistakes or confusion over what was in the video are irrelevant.

One of the “victims” (the same one who said the ground was “squishy” there) has acknowledged that one of the people right next to the plane in the video was not one of the people publicly known to have been on the plane. So even one of the witnesses there that day has acknowledged that there were extra people in the water while everybody was still next to the plane.

His comment was that we better have a good lawyer if we wanted to make anything of it. Strongly suggesting that very high-powered lawyers would be brought on to take us to the mat if we did anything actionable. Now who would have high-powered lawyers at their disposal, and why would they want to take us to the mat for simply affirming the acknowledged truth that there were extra people on-site IMMEDIATELY, before any rescuers arrived?

And why would those witnesses stand by and watch those who have noticed the truth be defamed and libeled, without correcting the record?

The life jacket you saw that had Fuddy floating dead in it - was it the fully-inflated adult life jacket that she had on in the video, or was it the partially-inflated infant jacket that the USCG pulled out of the water with “Fuddy” in it?

Thank you for believing my honesty and my Christianity. There can be honest disagreement over some things without assaulting the character of the other, but that certainly doesn’t serve the purposes of the Alinsky crowd.

The truth about HG will eventually be known. The roles of other freepers will also eventually be known.


106 posted on 08/09/2017 12:43:12 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
The truth about HG will eventually be known.

And upon that day you will bow before my blinding brilliance.

Until then, you're just making shit up.

107 posted on 08/09/2017 12:57:12 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

Thanks for that reply. I’m stepping out at the moment, but I will answer ASAP. I’ll try to locate the exact pic of Fuddy that I’m talking about then. That should clear up the life jacket question.


108 posted on 08/09/2017 1:19:32 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson