Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nikki Haley Rejects More U.N. Sessions on North Korea: ‘the Time for Talk Is Over’
Breitbart ^ | Adam Shaw

Posted on 07/31/2017 4:35:04 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

North Korea’s launch of a second intercontinental ballistic missile Friday—a missile some believe has the potential to reach U.S. cities—led to speculation that the U.S. would go to the U.N. to seek an emergency session and a resolution to put more pressure on the rogue state. CBS News reported Saturday that the U.S. was seeking an emergency session on Monday, but Haley shot down such reporting as “mistaken.”

“There is no point in having an emergency session if it produces nothing of consequence,” Haley said, before noting that North Korea is already the target of a number of Security Council resolutions which, she said, “they violate with impunity.”

*snip*

“An additional Security Council resolution that does not significantly increase the international pressure on North Korea is of no value,” she said. “In fact, it is worse than nothing, because it sends the message to the North Korean dictator that the international community is unwilling to seriously challenge him.”

Instead, she said the ball was now in China’s court. “China must decide whether it is finally willing to take this vital step. The time for talk is over,” she said.

Haley’s statement comes a day after President Trump took aim at China over its weak stance on North Korea, accusing the Chinese of being “just talk”:

I am very disappointed in China. Our foolish past leaders have allowed them to make hundreds of billions of dollars a year in trade, yet…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2017

…they do NOTHING for us with North Korea, just talk. We will no longer allow this to continue. China could easily solve this problem!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 29, 2017


(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nikkihaley; nikkihaleynk; nknukes; nkoutofcontrol; trumpasia; trumpun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: OKSooner
That won't happen.

What's going to happen is military action to remove Kim and liberate the people of North Korea.

21 posted on 07/31/2017 6:04:18 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Let me know when they put a ban on Chinese made products into the U.S or dramatically cut off trade with China. If they don’t do that then the threat isn’t as real as they say. Either do that or stop bringing it up


22 posted on 07/31/2017 6:08:47 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Okay fine.

It'll be ugly, the second worst thing to letting Clinton's and Madeline Albright's folly continue to fester.

Speaking of whom, where are they now?

23 posted on 07/31/2017 6:22:55 AM PDT by OKSooner (Never take a known wise-ass to the shooting range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

We are China’s largest customer. They know what, we know it, and we finally have a president that is willing to act like it. They need us. They are a debtor nation now too. If we put a tariff on goods from China they will be unable to do anything about it. What could they do? Sell our US bonds that they purchased years ago? They’ve been selling them. If they sold more it would just push the dollar down more and lower our US interest rates slightly. This would hurt them far, far more than it would hurt us. As a matter of fact it might help us more than hurt us in the short run. There’s a new president in town, China. And he is pro US.


24 posted on 07/31/2017 6:28:39 AM PDT by jdsteel (States rights don't include ignoring federal law.Give me freedom not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel
We will not start a trade war to get China to act on North Korea.

That would hurt us as much as China and cause a worldwide economic disruption and possibly a world war.

We will (keeping China and Russia in the loop as much as possible) remove Kim militarily.

It has to be done.

That is what Nikki Haley and Trump are saying.

25 posted on 07/31/2017 6:43:53 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
What's going to happen is military action to remove Kim and liberate the people of North Korea.

The Norks and Kim are puppets of China.

Everyone is overlooking what China has already suggested: China will take the Norks in hand if and when the USA withdraws from the south china sea which China is determined to take over.

That's what this is about.

26 posted on 07/31/2017 6:44:57 AM PDT by oldbrowser (The swamp will not surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Time for U.S. sanctions on nations that don’t put or don’t live up to sanctions on North Korea. We all know what that will mean.


27 posted on 07/31/2017 6:47:10 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Did you read my post? To have a trade war they would have to be buying from us, too. With the notable exception of Trump’s latest deal they don’t buy much. With trade imbalance like that they have much, MUCH more to lose.


28 posted on 07/31/2017 6:52:08 AM PDT by jdsteel (States rights don't include ignoring federal law.Give me freedom not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
I am sure China would like to see us withdraw from the South China Sea, but that isn't going to happen (see map--and that's just LNG shipping).

I don't know if North Korea is a puppet of China, per se. It is certainly China's pit bull, but I don't know how much control China has over Kim (probably not as much as it would like).

China knows we will not--cannot--stand by as Kim threatens to attack our mainland.

The time for action is upon us.

29 posted on 07/31/2017 6:58:12 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
Vive la difference!


30 posted on 07/31/2017 6:59:38 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

What’s the over/under on when Haley takes State from Tillerson?


31 posted on 07/31/2017 7:02:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel
To have a trade war they would have to be buying from us, too.

Do you realize how much prices in this county would rise immediately if we somehow stopped or significantly reduced our purchases from China?

And what about the $1.4 trillion U.S. Treasuries the Chinese own?

32 posted on 07/31/2017 7:04:48 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Do YOU realize how much prices would rise if the NORKs “nuked” Pearl Harbor?

Or what the market value of China’s $1.4 Trillion of Treasuries would be after we declare a “redemption holiday”?

Let’s not be paralyzed by Dem propaganda...


33 posted on 07/31/2017 7:28:55 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Do YOU realize how much prices would rise if the NORKs “nuked” Pearl Harbor?

Or what the market value of China’s $1.4 Trillion of Treasuries would be after we declare a “redemption holiday”?

Let’s not be paralyzed by Dem propaganda...


34 posted on 07/31/2017 7:29:25 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pfony1

What is a redemption holiday? I’m not familiar with that?


35 posted on 07/31/2017 7:33:44 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Redemption Holiday = a period when government debt obligation are NOT redeemed on their stated “due dates” for a reason such as “war”.


36 posted on 07/31/2017 8:41:28 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Redemption Holiday = a period when government debt obligation are NOT redeemed on their stated “due dates” for a reason such as “war”.


37 posted on 07/31/2017 8:41:46 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
The U.S. Treasury would NEVER refuse to redeem its debt when due.

That would cause a collapse in the market and destroy our borrowing capacity.

U.S. Treasuries are called the risk free investment for a reason.

38 posted on 07/31/2017 8:55:17 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Redemption Holiday = a period when government debt obligation are NOT redeemed on their stated “due dates” for a reason such as “war”.


39 posted on 07/31/2017 12:02:37 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“Do you realize how much prices in this county would rise immediately if we somehow stopped or significantly reduced our purchases from China?

And what about the $1.4 trillion U.S. Treasuries the Chinese own?”

You really didn’t bother reading my first post. I answered your second question already, so do that.

Next, Americans would simply have to be presented with the choice of having a TEMPORARY halt to cheap Chinese made items OR to have a hot war with the NORKS. That’s an easy answer.


40 posted on 07/31/2017 5:00:53 PM PDT by jdsteel (States rights don't include ignoring federal law.Give me freedom not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson