Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ ask Supreme Court for 'immediate intervention' on immigration ban, documents show
foxnews.com ^ | 7/15/17 | fox/ap

Posted on 07/15/2017 11:41:31 AM PDT by ColdOne

The Trump administration has told the Supreme Court that a lower court ruling earlier this week altering an executive order on immigration would bring thousands more refugees into the county and requires the justices’ “immediate intervention,” according to filing documents obtained early Saturday by Fox News.

In a victory for the administration, the Supreme Court late last month lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump's temporary travel ban on refugees and visitors from six mostly-Muslim countries.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; hawaii; immigrants; invaders; sc; scotus; terrorists; travelban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: beethovenfan

Those are federal judges not state or local.


21 posted on 07/15/2017 11:07:33 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The number of federal judges impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate can be counted on one hand. Too many Democrats in the Senate for that too happen.


22 posted on 07/15/2017 11:09:55 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Few federal judges have ever been removed from office, it was never “fairly common” but extremely rare. Impeachment and removal is constitutionally very, very hard.


23 posted on 07/15/2017 11:12:41 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Damn right...... but there must be a deterrent to stop judges from doing this Paz Angel all that says the president has the power to remove any judge if it is a matter of National Security and Pastor now while we still have the house and the Senate


24 posted on 07/15/2017 11:14:09 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

The Communists were far more conservative than the lunatic Left. It is not pursuing Communism but Nihilism as discussed in “Chaos and Mayhem”.


25 posted on 07/15/2017 11:14:52 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I think you have the best and only reasonable answer in your post 4.


26 posted on 07/16/2017 9:40:15 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: map

The gods in black dresses don’t care about the law. They make it from the bench and Hitlery Rotten Clinton herself told them to #Resist Trump and his policies.

The peaceful transfer of power is over in America and Democrats are playing up the notion that they are the president(s) in exile.


27 posted on 07/17/2017 6:29:48 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Bill Clinton and Al Gore took illegal campaign contributions from the Chi-Coms and 'nobody' cared...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

America is FUBAR!


28 posted on 07/17/2017 6:39:01 AM PDT by JayAr36 (The Aristocrats of the Senate need to be brought back to earth. They are NOT SPECIAL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
The Trump Administration should just say “SCOTUS has ruled and we do not recognize the lower court’s ruling on this.

What he should does stop all immigration until they stop meddling, but he won't. He put up with those meddling midgets and let them make the rules for the President, bad move.

29 posted on 07/17/2017 10:11:06 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Only the SCOTUS is a Constitutional entity inferior to no one.

That is not true, it is just accepted by Congress since Marbury. Congress can pass legislation that is not subject to review and thy have done it many times.

Personally I think that congress likes the current method because it allows them to change the law then say the court has spoken and take no blame for it.

30 posted on 07/17/2017 10:21:48 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
-- Congress has Direct control over the courts and Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell could stop this tomorrow, But they won't. --

Just as expedient in this case, Congress has direct control over immigration. It could weigh in in either direction on this case.

Congress won't, it does all it can to avoid accountability.

31 posted on 07/17/2017 10:29:10 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


32 posted on 07/17/2017 10:30:26 AM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson