Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: microgood

After 21 years of development and trouble shooting it is obsolete befoe it is completed.

Somebody needs to just kill this POS. Too big to fail is a poor excuse for outrigh failure. Anybody that points to Lockheed as having retained their prowess as an aircraft builder needs to rethink their claims. Lockheed has milked the treasury for all it can and it is time to stop them.

This thing is a poster child of a failed project.


29 posted on 07/04/2017 10:33:47 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101

“To big to fail” means “to many people on the gravy train to keep it going”.

Someone needs to teach the Defense department project management skills. Kill it if it needs to be killed, and move on.

The Russians are fielding tanks, helicopters, and fighters two or even more generations ahead of what we have, and the money keeps going into a fighter than is pretty hard on the pilots.


57 posted on 07/05/2017 6:03:33 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson